A client received 200ml of tube feedings the nurse can administer the next feeding if there is

Am J Crit Care. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 Jan 15.

Published in final edited form as:

Am J Crit Care. 2008 Nov; 17[6]: 512–520.

PMCID: PMC2627559

NIHMSID: NIHMS86207

Abstract

Background

The helpfulness of bedside assessment of gastric residual volume in the prediction of aspiration has been questioned, as has the volume that signals increased risk of aspiration.

Objective

To describe the association between gastric residual volumes and aspiration of gastric contents.

Methods

In a prospective study of 206 critically ill patients receiving gastric tube feedings for 3 consecutive days, gastric residual volumes were measured with 60-mL syringes every 4 hours. Measured volumes were categorized into 3 overlapping groups: at least 150 mL, at least 200 mL, and at least 250 mL. Patients were categorized as frequent aspirators if 40% or more of their tracheal secretions were positive for pepsin and as infrequent aspirators if less than 40% of their secretions were positive for pepsin. Gastric residual volumes were compared between the 2 aspiration groups.

Results

Approximately 39% of the 206 patients had 1 or more gastric residual volumes of at least 150 mL, 27% had 1 or more volumes of at least 200 mL, and 17% had 1 or more volumes of at least 250 mL. Large-bore tubes identified most of the high volumes. Eighty-nine patients were frequent aspirators. Volumes less than 150 mL were common in both aspiration groups. However, the frequent aspirators had a significantly greater frequency of 2 or more volumes of at least 200 mL and 1 or more volumes of at least 250 mL.

Conclusions

No consistent relationship was found between aspiration and gastric residual volumes. Although aspiration occurs without high gastric residual volumes, it occurs significantly more often when volumes are high.

Notice to CE enrollees

A closed-book, multiple-choice examination following this article tests your understanding of the following objectives:

1. Describe the association between gastric residual volumes [GRVs] and aspiration of gastric contents.

2. Recognize that measurement error is a significant problem in assessing GRVs.

3. Understand that aspiration risk is significantly increased when GRVs are high.

To read this article and take the CE test online, visit www.ajcconline.org and click “CE Articles in This Issue.” No CE test fee for AACN members.

Measurement of gastric residual volume [GRV] is often recommended to determine tolerance to gastric tube feedings.1–7 An underlying assumption is that high GRVs increase the risk for gastroesophageal reflux and associated aspiration. However, the extent to which bedside assessment of GRVs can help predict aspiration risk has been questioned,8 as has the amount of GRV that signals increased risk of aspiration.9–13 Values as low as 50 mL and higher than 500 mL have been reported.14–19

Objective

The objective of this prospective study was to describe the association between GRV and aspiration of gastric contents in a group of critically ill patients receiving gastric tube feedings.

Methods

Setting and Subjects

The study was conducted at Saint Louis University Hospital in St Louis, Missouri. Table 1 specifies demographic information for the 206 patients, and Table 2 has a description of their treatment conditions. The work was done in accordance with the appropriate institutional review body and carried out within the ethical standards set forth in the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or their legal guardians. Because of reports1,6–19 that high GRVs are more likely to occur during the first few days of tube feedings, attempts were made to enroll patients on the day that feedings began.

Table 1

Demographic information

Table 2

Description of treatment conditions

To be included in the study, patients must have been admitted to 1 of 5 intensive care units [ICUs] at Saint Louis University Hospital, be receiving continuous gastric tube feedings, have a tracheal intubation, be at least 18 years old, and provide informed consent [or have a legal guardian provide informed consent]. Patients were excluded from the study if tube feedings were discontinued or tracheal extubation occurred before completion of the 3-day study.

Data Collection

Table 3 is a summary of measurements made during the 3-day study period. All data were collected by registered nurse research assistants who were present in the involved ICUs from 8 AM through midnight, 7 days per week, for 24 months. Each patient participated in the study for 3 consecutive days. Most [n = 155] patients were admitted to the study within 24 hours of the start of gastric feeding; the remaining 51 patients had been fed a mean of 3.8 [SD, 2.3] days before entry into the study [range, 2–10 days].

Table 3

Summary of measurements

Measurements

Pepsin Assay to Assess for Aspiration

An immunoassay was used to detect pepsin in the suctioned tracheal secretions. The procedure for the assay has been described previously20; in an animal model, the assay had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 100%. Within an hour after collection, each secretion was cryopreserved for later analysis. The assay can detect pepsin in a concentration as low as 1 μg/mL. Gels were read by the same biochemist, who did not know the patients’ clinical statuses; results were recorded as positive or negative. Pepsin-positive tracheal secretions served as a proxy for the aspiration of gastric contents.

Gastric Residual Volume

As shown in Table 2, 44.2% [n = 91] of the patients enrolled in the study had 10F polyurethane tubes; the rest had either polyvinyl chloride sump tubes [n = 99] or gastrostomy tubes [n = 16]. Formula flow was turned off and the tube was flushed with 30 mL of air to force the tube’s ports away from the mucosal folds. A 60-mL syringe was used to withdraw as much fluid as possible from the stomach. If 60 mL was withdrawn into the syringe, the fluid was emptied into a calibrated container, and the procedure was repeated until no more fluid could be withdrawn. Any amount less than 200 mL was reinstilled into the feeding tube. The tube was then flushed with 30 mL of water before being reconnected to the feeding pump. The GRV measurements were made in whatever position the patient was in at the time; no attempt was made to control this variable.

Glasgow Coma Scale

The Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] is used to assess level of consciousness by evaluating eye opening, motor response, and verbal response. Because all patients were intubated, the best verbal response was estimated as appears able to converse, ability to converse is in question, or generally unresponsive. Possible scores ranged from 3 [worst] to 15 [best].

Sedation Score

The level of sedation was assessed by using the Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Scale.21 This scale was specifically developed for use with adult, critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation and consists of two 5-item subscales for quantifying interaction along a continuum from 5 to 30 points. Possible total scores ranged between 10 [worst] to 60 [best].

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II

The score on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II was calculated for each patient when the patient was admitted to the ICU. Parameters used to calculate the score included body temperature; mean arterial pressure; heart rate; respiratory rate; oxygenation; serum levels of sodium, potassium, and creatinine; hematocrit; white blood cell count; GCS score; chronic health points; and age. Possible scores were from 0 [best] to 71 [worst].

Vomiting and Use of Medications

The registered nurses who were the research assistants reviewed patients’ medical records to determine if vomiting had occurred and to see if specific medications [stress ulcer prophylaxis, prokinetics, opioids, and dopamine] had been administered. These data were recorded at 4-hour intervals on the data collection forms for comparison with other clinical data.

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics [frequencies, percentages, and means and standard deviations] were used to report the data. A 1-way analysis of variance was used to compare variation in the percentage of aspiration according to changes in GRVs [categorized in 50-mL intervals from 0 to >250 mL]. A χ2 test was used to evaluate the association between dichotomized variables. A backward logistic regression was used to compare the relationship between aspiration and GRVs in context with other risk factors for aspiration.22

Results

As indicated in Table 1, most patients were recruited from the trauma/surgery ICU; the next most frequently represented ICUs were general medicine and neurosurgery/neuromedicine. A higher percentage of men than women [61.2% vs 38.8%] participated in the project, primarily because the study site is a level I trauma center. A total of 86 patients [41.7%] had head injuries or cranial neurosurgical conditions. The mean GCS score was 7.1 [SD, 3.0]; almost three-fourths [72.3%] of the patients had a mean GCS score less than 9. Further, the score on the Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Scale [mean, 35.9; SD, 4.8] indicated that the patients were heavily sedated; 71.2% had a mean score of 35 or less. Only a small percentage [6.8%] of the patients vomited during the 3-day study period. Although all 206 patients were receiving gastric feedings at the start of data collection, 14 patients [6.8%] had their tubes moved to the small bowel shortly before the end of the data collection period. In 12 of these patients, the tubes were repositioned to the small bowel because of persistent high GRVs or hypoactive bowel sounds; in the remaining 2, large-bore nasogastric tubes were replaced with small-bore nasointestinal tubes.

Frequency of Aspiration

A total of 3203 tracheal secretions were assayed for pepsin. The mean percentage of tracheal secretions ppositive for pepsin in the entire sample was 36.2% [SD, 24.7%; range, 0%–100%]. Most [92.7%] of the 206 patients had at least 1 tracheal secretion positive for pepsin during the 3-day study period. Because of this result, all patients had to be categorized according to the frequency of aspiration. Patients whose secretions were positive for pepsin in 40% or more of the observations were classified as frequent aspirators; patients with pepsin detected in less than 40% of observations were classified as infrequent aspirators. The median percentage of pepsin-positive tracheal secretions among the 89 frequent aspirators was 53.8%, as opposed to 19.2% among the 117 infrequent aspirators [Figure 1].

Median, upper and lower quartiles, and range of percentages of pepsin-positive tracheal secretions in the frequent and infrequent aspiration groups.

Frequency of High GRVs

A total of 3286 GRVs were measured [mean, 37.1 mL; SD, 36.6 mL]. In an attempt to evaluate cutoff points for high GRVs commonly referred to in the literature,4,23–25 we categorized high GRVs into 3 overlapping groups: at least 150 mL, at least 200 mL, and at least 250 mL. The frequency with which these GRV categories were identified is shown in Figure 2. Overall, 72.8% of the GRVs of at least 150 mL, 74.5% of the GRVs of at least 200 mL, and 80% of the GRVs of at least 250 mL were in patients with large-bore tubes; the rest of the high GRVs were in patients with small-bore tubes.

Frequency of high gastric residual volumes [N = 206]

Patients admitted to the study within 24 hours of the start of gastric feeding were more likely to have at least 1 high GRV in the subsequent 3-day period. For example, 69 of the 81 patients with 1 or more GRVs of at least 150 mL were enrolled within 24 hours of the start of feeding [P = .008].

Relationship Between Aspiration and Gastric Residual Volume

Figure 3 depicts the percentage of secretions indicating aspiration associated with a continuum of GRVs [categorized in 50-mL intervals from 0 to >250 mL]. The percentage of secretions indicating aspiration that occurred when GRVs were between 0 and 50 mL was relatively high [33.7%]. However, the percentage of aspiration increased as GRVs increased [F = 7.7, P < .001].

Mean percentage of pepsin-positive tracheal secretions according to gastric residual volume. Data are from 3286 aspirates from small- and large-bore tubes. By 1-way analysis of variance, P < .001.

Chi-square tests were done to determine the relationship between the high GRV categories and the 2 aspiration groups. The frequent and infrequent aspirators did not differ significantly in the following categories: 1 or more GRVs of at least 150 mL [χ2 = 0.3, P = .56] and 1 or more GRVs of at least 200 mL [χ2 = 2.8, P = .10; Figure 4]. However, the aspiration groups differed significantly in the following GRV categories: 2 or more GRVs of at least 150 mL [χ2 = 4.6, P = .03], 2 or more GRVs of at least 200 mL [χ2=4.9, P = .03], 1 or more GRVs of at least 250 mL [χ2 = 4.9, P = .03], and 2 or more GRVs of at least 250 mL [χ2 = 7.1, P = .008].

Distribution of gastric residual volume categories in frequent and infrequent aspirators [univariate analysis, χ2 analysis].

Because of the patients’ high acuity level, we evaluated the association between the various GRV categories and aspiration in context with other risk factors for aspiration. To predict the aspiration group, each of the GRV categories [1 or more GRVs ≥150 mL, 2 or more GRVs ≥150 mL, 1 or more GRVs ≥200 mL, 2 or more GRVs ≥200 mL, 1 or more GRVs ≥250 mL, and 2 or more GRVs ≥250 mL] were entered separately into a backward logistic regression equation with the following variables: a mean GCS score less than 9, heavy sedation [defined as a mean Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Score ≤35], vomiting, a mean head-of-bed elevation