Academic journals that accept book reviews

  • Published: 10 November 2016

Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics

  • Weishu Liu ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8780-67091,
  • Yishan Ding2 &
  • Mengdi Gu2

Scientometrics volume110,pages 355364 (2017)Cite this article

  • 1284 Accesses

  • 11 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Book reviews play important roles in scholarly communication especially in arts and humanities disciplines. By using Web of Sciences Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts & Humanities Citation Index, this study probed the patterns and dynamics of book reviews within these three indexes empirically during the past decade (20062015). We found that the absolute numbers of book reviews among all the three indexes were relatively stable but the relative shares were decreasing. Book reviews were very common in arts and humanities, common in social sciences, but rare in natural sciences. Book reviews are mainly contributed by authors from developed economies such as the USA and the UK. Oppositely, scholars from China and Japan are unlikely to contribute to book reviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

34,95

Price includes VAT (Vietnam)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Rent this article via DeepDyve.

Learn more about Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Academic journals that accept book reviews
Fig.2
Academic journals that accept book reviews
Fig.3
Academic journals that accept book reviews

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Web of Science category information was retrieved on 17th October, 2016.

  2. 2.

    The number of general articles began to surpass book reviews from 2013 in A&HCI index.

  3. 3.

    Information Science & Library Science is a SSCI category, 44,207 out of 52,097 (84.86%) book reviews in this category were published in the Library Journal. For more information about this journal, please refer to : http://lj.libraryjournal.com/.

References

  1. East, J. W. (2011). The scholarly book review in the humanities: An academic Cinderella? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(1), 5267. doi:10.3138/jsp.43.1.52.

    Google Scholar

  2. Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Purnell, P. J. (2014). The power of book reviews: A simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes. Scientometrics, 98(2), 841852. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1176-4.

    Article Google Scholar

  3. Guan, J. C., Yan, Y., & Zhang, J. J. (2015). How do collaborative features affect scientific output? Evidences from wind power field. Scientometrics, 102(1), 333355. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1311-x.

    Google Scholar

  4. Hartley, J. (2006). Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 11941207. doi:10.1002/asi.20399.

    Article Google Scholar

  5. Hartley, J. (2010). The anatomy of a book review. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(4), 473487. doi:10.2190/TW.40.4.g.

    Article Google Scholar

  6. Hartley, J., Cowan, J., Deeson, C., & Thomas, P. (2016). Book reviews in time. Scientometrics,. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2114-z.

    Google Scholar

  7. Karaulova, M., Gök, A., Shackleton, O., & Shapira, P. (2016). Science system path-dependencies and their influences: nanotechnology research in Russia. Scientometrics, 107(2), 645670. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1916-3.

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Kindle, P. A. (2015). Teaching students to write book reviews. Contemporary Rural Social Work, 7(2), 135141.

    Google Scholar

  9. Liu, W. (2016). Comments on a comparative analysis of scientific publications in management journals by authors from Mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau: 20032012. Scientometrics, 106(3), 12691272. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1809-x.

    Article Google Scholar

  10. Lee, A. D., Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Nyquist, J. (2010). How to write a scholarly book review for publication in a peer-reviewed journal: A review of the literature. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 24(1), 5769. doi:10.7899/1042-5055-24.1.57.

    Article Google Scholar

  11. Liu, W., Gu, M., Hu, G., Li, C., Liao, H., Tang, L., et al. (2014). Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective. Scientometrics, 99(2), 507521. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1152-z.

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Liu, W., Hu, G., & Gu, M. (2016). The probability of publishing in first-quartile journals. Scientometrics, 106(3), 12731276. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1821-1.

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Liu, W. S., Hu, G. Y., Tang, L., & Wang, Y. D. (2015a). Chinas global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (19782013). Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 555569. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.007.

    Article Google Scholar

  14. Liu, W., & Liao, H. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 19702015. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,. doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0272-z.

    Google Scholar

  15. Liu, W., Tang, L., Gu, M., & Hu, G. (2015b). Feature report on China: A bibliometric analysis of China-related articles. Scientometrics, 102(1), 503517. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1371-y.

    Article Google Scholar

  16. Oinas, P., & Leppälä, S. (2013). Views on book reviews. Regional Studies, 47(10), 17851789. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.856530.

    Article Google Scholar

  17. Sun, Y., & Grimes, S. (2016). The emerging dynamic structure of national innovation studies: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 1740. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1778-0.

    Article Google Scholar

  18. Tan, J., Fu, H.-Z., & Ho, Y.-S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded. Scientometrics, 98(2), 14731490. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1125-2.

    Article Google Scholar

  19. Tang, L., Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2015). Is there a clubbing effect underlying Chinese research citation Increases? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 19231932. doi:10.1002/asi.23302.

    Article Google Scholar

  20. Yu, D. J., Li, D. F., Merigo, J. M., & Fang, L. C. (2016). Mapping development of linguistic decision making studies. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30(5), 27272736. doi:10.3233/ifs-152026.

    Article Google Scholar

  21. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83104. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.006.

    Article Google Scholar

  22. Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glanzel, W. (2009). Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? Scientometrics, 79(3), 593621. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2068-x.

    Article Google Scholar

  23. Zuccala, A., & van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 19791991. doi:10.1002/asi.21588.

    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (#16ZD08, #13AZD072, and #12AZD046). All the views expressed herein are those of the authors who also take full responsibility for any errors. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewer for his (her) constructive comments and kindly help in editing the language of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Information Management and Engineering, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China

    Weishu Liu

  2. Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200052, China

    Yishan Ding&Mengdi Gu

Authors
  1. Weishu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Yishan Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Mengdi Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weishu Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Ding, Y. & Gu, M. Book reviews in academic journals: patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics 110, 355364 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2172-2

Download citation

  • Received: 28 September 2016

  • Published: 10 November 2016

  • Issue Date: January 2017

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2172-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Book review
  • Academic journal
  • Web of Science
  • Sciences and social sciences
  • Arts and humanities

JEL Classification

  • I29 Y30