Let's Ask & Get Answers
Darley and batson [1973] found that the helping behavior of seminary students was best predicted by
Answer
Australian Society for Music Education [ASME]
Step-by-step explanation : Brad Fuller - Is “What Works Best”, best for music education?
Related Question
Aazadsocial sciences
Which famous British physicist wrote A Brief History of Time?
Adityaloksocial sciences
What medical problems did ram prasad suffer with?
Ahsaminsocial sciences
Difference Between HYV Seeds and Traditional Seeds
Akhtarsocial sciences
Why the sky is blue?
Alahbasrisocial sciences
2. Name the prominent reformers of southern India.
Amartsocial sciences
Roads made of coal and concrete
Ambiyasocial sciences
Difference between the urban and rural transportation
Amitasocial sciences
Why only Brussels are choosen for formation of Europeion union why others not
Amreensocial sciences
Write a note on the dance and music of the islanders
Amrootisocial sciences
Mat migrated to take
Anadisocial sciences
Tell me answer
Anamikasocial sciences
Give a brief information of Elora Caves.
Anchalsocial sciences
Describe the colourful dresses of Rajasthan
Angregsocial sciences
Which is the largest country in the world
Anshiyasocial sciences
Why is the standard merdian selected by a country a multiply of 7.5
Anupamasocial sciences
How do we implement our constitution in our day to day life?
Anupumasocial sciences
Why Supreme Court is called as court of verdict
Arshsocial sciences
Who is known as the creater of this universe
Ashifsocial sciences
Should parents have a say in the career of their children
Asifsocial sciences
Explain the significance of the regulating act.
The Details
Social psychologists John Darley and Daniel Batson wanted to know why people help in some situations but not others. They decided to study one allegedly charitable group: seminary students training to become priests.
The researchers asked each of 67 seminary students to deliver a sermon on the parable of the Good Samaritan, a Bible story about helping strangers in need. The researchers then randomly assigned the students to one of two conditions. In the hurried condition, a research assistant concluded the sermon instructions with “Oh, you’re late. They were expecting you a few minutes ago. We’d better get moving.”
In the unhurried condition, the research assistant ended the instructions with, “It’ll be a few minutes before they’re ready for you, but you might as well head on over.”
Each student walked alone to the building where he would deliver the sermon. On the way, the student encountered a man slumped in a doorway with his eyes closed, coughing and moaning, clearly in distress.
From afar, researchers watched: Would the seminary student stop to help the stranger in need?
Darley and Batson found that only 10% of seminary students in the hurried condition stopped to help the man. In comparison, 63% of the participants in the unhurried condition stopped. In other words, being in a hurry can lead even a seminary student with the Good Samaritan on the mind to ignore a person in distress.
Why This Works
When pressed for time, people must choose between helping and meeting other goals. But when people are not hurried, they can pursue multiple goals, in order of importance. In addition, people with time to spare can broaden their attention and notice more details about their environments.
When This Works Best
Even seminary students benefited from slowing down. Likewise, reducing time pressure will likely help most people pay attention to their surroundings and respond more readily to others in need.
The Original Study
Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. [1973]. "From Jerusalem to Jericho": A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27[1], 100.
Credits
Text by Sarah Lyons-Padilla
Photo CC by Oiluj Samall Zeid
Donate »
SPARQ relies on grants and donations. Your support is appreciated!