How did the abolition of slavery impact the womens rights movement in the United States
|
Journal Information The National Women's Studies Association Journal (NWSA Journal) publishes interdisciplinary and multicultural feminist scholarship focused on understanding women's lives. The NWSAJ accepts articles that are both theoretical and practical, thereby foregrounding the ways in which critical analysis can inform action both in and outside of academic settings. In addition to its essays focusing on feminist scholarship and its reviews of books, the NWSAJ regularly publishes special issues focused on topics especially important in the field of Women's Studies. In this capacity, the NWSAJ serves as a leader in the field of Women's Studies. Show Publisher Information One of the largest publishers in the United States, the Johns Hopkins University Press combines traditional books and journals publishing units with cutting-edge service divisions that sustain diversity and independence among nonprofit, scholarly publishers, societies, and associations. Journals The Press is home to the largest journal publication program of any U.S.-based university press. The Journals Division publishes 85 journals in the arts and humanities, technology and medicine, higher education, history, political science, and library science. The division also manages membership services for more than 50 scholarly and professional associations and societies. Books With critically acclaimed titles in history, science, higher education, consumer health, humanities, classics, and public health, the Books Division publishes 150 new books each year and maintains a backlist in excess of 3,000 titles. With warehouses on three continents, worldwide sales representation, and a robust digital publishing program, the Books Division connects Hopkins authors to scholars, experts, and educational and research institutions around the world. Project MUSE® Project MUSE is a leading provider of digital humanities and social sciences content, providing access to journal and book content from nearly 300 publishers. MUSE delivers outstanding results to the scholarly community by maximizing revenues for publishers, providing value to libraries, and enabling access for scholars worldwide. Hopkins Fulfillment Services (HFS) HFS provides print and digital distribution for a distinguished list of university presses and nonprofit institutions. HFS clients enjoy state-of-the-art warehousing, real-time access to critical business data, accounts receivable management and collection, and unparalleled customer service. Note: This article is a review of another work, such as a book, film, musical composition, etc. The original work is not included in the purchase of this review. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. By Nancy A. Hewitt In the years between the Seneca Falls Convention and the Civil War, powerful links existed between antislavery and women’s rights advocates. Virtually all women’s rights advocates supported abolition. Not all abolitionists supported women’s rights, however; since some believed that it was inappropriate for women to be engaged in public, political action. Still, these differences among abolitionists did little to deter the common work of those who embraced emancipation for both slaves and women. From 1848 through the Civil War, those who argued for wider roles for women generally called themselves women’s rights advocates rather than suffragists. The right to vote was included among their goals, but their agenda was much broader than any single issue. In addition, most women’s rights supporters had been introduced to reform efforts through the antislavery movement and specifically through the American Anti-Slavery Society (AASS) led by William Lloyd Garrison. Members of the AASS argued that abolition could only be achieved by persuading Americans—slaveholders and non-slaveholders alike—that human bondage was against God’s law. Many Garrisonians, including a large number of Quakers, refused to participate in electoral politics due to the government’s support of slavery and the U.S. war against Mexico. Garrisonian women did not necessarily oppose woman suffrage, but they emphasized instead the right of women to gain equal access to education and employment; equality within marriage, the family, and religion; and a married woman’s right to property, wages, control over her own body, and custody of her children. They advocated similar rights for African Americans and focused particularly on the sexual abuse of slave women as one of the strongest arguments for eradicating slavery. The AASS provided women with opportunities to speak, organize, and write on behalf of slaves; and to hold office, raise funds, and edit newspapers for the cause. Lucretia Mott, co-organizer of the Seneca Falls Woman’s Rights Convention, was a Garrisonian abolitionist and a charter member of the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society founded in 1833, which included both African-American and white women in its ranks. Many Garrisonian societies were interracial and mixed-sex organizations, and all argued on principle for both racial equality and a woman’s right to a public role. Other antislavery groups, such as the Liberty and Free Soil parties, focused on political action as the best means of achieving abolition. However, they attracted fewer women to their ranks and relegated them to secondary roles, such as raising funds to support men’s activities and agendas. It was only in the aftermath of the Civil War, when Republican politicians introduced the 14th and 15th amendments to the U.S. Constitution extending citizenship and suffrage to former slave men, that suffrage gained the central place in the battle for women’s rights. Then former abolitionist allies, including those who had long advocated women’s rights, divided over the movement’s priorities. Many abolitionists initially advocated universal suffrage, for both African Americans and women. When that was made impossible by the insertion of the word male in the 14th and 15th amendments, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony, with support from African Americans like Sojourner Truth, campaigned against any amendment that would deny voting rights to women. Among their opponents were former allies like Lucy Stone, Antoinette Brown Blackwell, Wendell Phillips, and Frederick Douglass, who argued that it was “the Negro’s hour” and that women’s suffrage would have to wait. As a result of this division, Stanton and Anthony founded the National Woman Suffrage Association, a women-only organization, in 1869 to promote a federal amendment guaranteeing woman suffrage. Stone and Blackwell formed a rival organization—the American Woman Suffrage Association—that included men as well as women and advocated a state-by-state campaign for female enfranchisement. Not until 1890 would the divisions created by the battle over black men’s enfranchisement heal, allowing suffragists and former abolitionist allies to work together again in the National American Women’s Suffrage Association. Nonetheless, even though the abolitionist-women’s rights alliance fractured in the late 1860s, suffragists owed a substantial debt to the antislavery movement, which had served as the most important training ground for its leaders and the most important repository for ideas of sexual as well as racial emancipation in the decades before the Civil War. About the Author: Nancy A. Hewitt is Professor of History at Rutgers University. She received her Ph.D. at University of Pennsylvania in 1981 and taught at University of South Florida and Duke University before moving to Rutgers in 1998. She is the author of "Women’s Activism and Social Change: Rochester, New York, 1822-1872" (Cornell University Press, 1984) and "Forging Activist Identities: Latin, African American and Anglo Women in Tampa, Florida, 1870s-1920s" (University of Illinois Press, forthcoming). She has also edited a collection of articles, "Women, Families and Communities: Readings in American History," aimed at helping teachers integrate stories of women into American History courses. And she has facilitated curriculum integration workshops on gender and race for middle school, high school, and college teachers in Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Illinois, and New Jersey. Back to Essays How did the abolition of slavery impact the women's rights movement in the United States quizlet?How did the fight to end slavery help spark the women's movement? "Women who fought to end slavery began to recognize their own bondage." The abolitionist movement helped women see the discrimination they encountered in their own lives, and they organized to end this discrimination.
How did the abolition movement help lead to the women's rights movement?The Woman's Rights Movement
The American Woman's Rights movement grew out of abolitionism in direct but complex ways. The movement's early leaders began their fight for social justice with the cause of the slaves, and learned from Anti-Slavery Societies how to organize, publicize and articulate a political protest.
What impact did the abolition of slavery have?Former slaves would now be classified as “labor,” and hence the labor stock would rise dramatically, even on a per capita basis. Either way, abolishing slavery made America a much more productive, and hence richer country.
|
