In caring for a young child with pain, which assessment tool is the most useful?

#117

Pediatric Pain Assessment Scales

  • Gena Walker
  • Robert M Arnold MD

Download PDF

Background     Neonates and infants do experience pain. In fact, research has shown that neonates may experience as much pain as older children and long-term consequences from exposure to repeated painful stimuli.  Untreated pain leads to increased sensitivity to subsequent stimuli.  Assessing pain in neonates and young children requires use of age appropriate scales.  There is no empirical evidence demonstrating the superiority of one assessment tool, but research suggests that the same scale(s) should be used within an institution.

Behavioral Observational Scales:  The primary method of pain assessment for infants, children less than 3 yrs old, and developmentally disabled patients. Validated tools include:

CRIES:  Assesses Crying, Oxygen requirement, Increased vital signs, facial Expression, Sleep.  An observer provides a score of 0-2 for each parameter based on changes from baseline.  For example, a grimace, the facial expression most often associated with pain, gains a score of 1 but if associated with a grunt will be scored a 2. The scale is useful for neonatal postoperative pain.

NIPS:  Neonatal/Infants Pain Scale has been used mostly in infants less than 1 yr of age. Facial expression, cry, breathing pattern, arms, legs, and state of arousal are observed for 1 minute intervals before, during, and after a procedure and a numeric score is assigned to each.  A score >3 indicates pain. An example is available at:  http://www.anes.ucla.edu/pain/assessment_tool-nips.htm.

FLACC:  Face, Legs, Activity, Crying, Consolability scale has been validated from 2 mo to 7 years.  FLACC uses 0-10 scoring.  An example is available at: http://www.anes.ucla.edu/pain/assessment_tool-flacc.htm.

CHEOPS:  Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Scale. Intended for children 1-7 yrs old. Assesses cry, facial expression, verbalization, torso movement, if child touches affected site, and position of legs.  A score >/= 4 signifies pain. An example is available at: http://www.anes.ucla.edu/pain/assessment_tool-cheops.htm.  

Self report:  Children 3 years of age and older can rank their pain using one of several validated scales including:

Wong-Baker Faces scale: 6 cartoon faces showing increasing degrees of distress. Face 0 signifies “no hurt” and face 5 the “worst hurt you can imagine.”  The child chooses the face that best describes pain at the time of assessment. An example is available at: http://www1.us.elsevierhealth.com/FACES/.

Bieri-Modified: 6 cartoon faces starting from a neutral state and progressing to tears/crying.  Scored 0-10 by the child.  Used for children >3 years.

Visual analogue scale:  Uses a 10 cm line with one end marked as no pain and the opposite end marked as the worst pain.  The child is asked to make a mark on that line that is then measured in cm from the no pain end.

Parent or Caregiver Report:

INRS: Individualized Numeric Rating Scale.  This is a validated pain assessment tool for nonverbal children with intellectual disability. Essentially, it is an adaptation of the numeric rating scale that incorporates the parents’ and/or caregiver’s descriptions of the child’s past and current responses to pain. Once described, the responses are then stratified on a scale from 0 to 10.

References

  1. Hockenberry M, Wilson D, et al.  Wong’s Nursing Care of Infants and Children. 7th Edition.  St Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003: pp1052-1053.
  2. Berde CB, Sethna NF.  Analgesics for the treatment of pain in children.  N Engl J Med. 2002; 347:1094-1101.
  3. Zempsky WT, Schechter, NL.  What’s new in the management of pain in children.  Pediatrics in Review. 2003; 24:337-347.
  4. Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T,  Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997; 3(3):293-7.
  5. Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, et al. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001; 93(2):173-83.
  6. Cancer Pain Management in Children (web-site). Texas Cancer Council.  Available at:  http://www.childcancerpain.org.
  7. Solodiuk J, Curley MA.  Pain assessment in nonverbal children with severe cognitive impairments: the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS). J Pediatr Nurs 2003; 18:295-299.
  8. Solodiuk JC, Scott-Sutherland J, et al.  Validation of the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS): a pain assessment tool for nonverbal children with intellectual disability. Pain 2010; 150:231-236.

Version History:  This Fast Fact was originally edited by David E Weissman MD and published in June 2004. Re-copy-edited in April 2009; web-sites updated; revised again in July 2015 by Sarah Friebert MD.

Fast Facts and Concepts are edited by Sean Marks MD (Medical College of Wisconsin) and associate editor Drew A Rosielle MD (University of Minnesota Medical School), with the generous support of a volunteer peer-review editorial board, and are made available online by the Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin (PCNOW); the authors of each individual Fast Fact are solely responsible for that Fast Fact’s content. The full set of Fast Facts are available at Palliative Care Network of Wisconsin with contact information, and how to reference Fast Facts.

Copyright:  All Fast Facts and Concepts are published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Copyright (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).  Fast Facts can only be copied and distributed for non-commercial, educational purposes. If you adapt or distribute a Fast Fact, let us know!

Disclaimer: Fast Facts and Concepts provide educational information for health care professionals. This information is not medical advice. Fast Facts are not continually updated, and new safety information may emerge after a Fast Fact is published. Health care providers should always exercise their own independent clinical judgment and consult other relevant and up-to-date experts and resources. Some Fast Facts cite the use of a product in a dosage, for an indication, or in a manner other than that recommended in the product labeling. Accordingly, the official prescribing information should be consulted before any such product is used.

When caring for a young child with pain which assessment tool is the most useful?

Infants (0–12 months) The best way to assess pain in babies is to observe how they behave. The FLACC (faces, legs, activity, cry, consolability) scale is an easy-to-use tool that helps measure pain in children who are too young to talk.

Which of the following is used for assessing the pain in children?

Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) FLACC relies on behavioural indicators to assess pain. This tool is a checklist that guides the health-care professional in examining the child's behaviour in response to pain.

What are the most commonly used pediatric pain scales?

Pediatrics.
Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS).
Neonatal/Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).
Neonatal Facial Coding System (NFCS).
CRIES..
Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC).
Revised-FLACC..
Non Communicating Children's Pain Checklist (NCCPC-R).
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS).

What is the most commonly used method to assess pain?

Because pain is an internal, private experience, self-report remains the gold standard for its measurement. The most commonly assessed aspect of clinical pain is its sensory intensity.