Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

In principle, the concepts behind Sanger vs. next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are similar. In both NGS and Sanger sequencing (also known as dideoxy or capillary electrophoresis sequencing), DNA polymerase adds fluorescent nucleotides one by one onto a growing DNA template strand. Each incorporated nucleotide is identified by its fluorescent tag.

The critical difference between Sanger sequencing and NGS is sequencing volume. While the Sanger method only sequences a single DNA fragment at a time, NGS is massively parallel, sequencing millions of fragments simultaneously per run. This process translates into sequencing hundreds to thousands of genes at one time. NGS also offers greater discovery power to detect novel or rare variants with deep sequencing.

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Advantages of NGS include:

  • Higher sensitivity to detect low-frequency variants1,2
  • Faster turnaround time for high sample volumes3
  • Comprehensive genomic coverage
  • Lower limit of detection4,5
  • Higher capacity with sample multiplexing
  • Ability to sequence hundreds to thousands of genes or gene regions simultaneously

Choosing NGS vs. Sanger Sequencing

Explore the benefits and limitations of each method to understand which one best suits your needs.

View Infographic

“With Sanger sequencing, we saw a limited DNA snapshot… NGS and its massively parallel sequencing enable us to look at tens to hundreds of thousands of reads per sample.”

Michael Bunce, PhD
Professor, Head of TrEnD laboratory, Curtin University

 Sanger SequencingTargeted NGS
Benefits
  • Fast, cost-effective sequencing for low numbers of targets (1–20 targets)
  • Familiar workflow
  • Higher sequencing depth enables higher sensitivity (down to 1%)
  • Higher discovery power*
  • Higher mutation resolution†
  • More data produced with the same amount of input DNA‡
  • Higher sample throughput
Challenges
  • Low sensitivity (limit of detection
    ~15–20%)
  • Low discovery power
  • Not as cost-effective for high numbers of targets (> 20 targets)
  • Low scalability due to increasing sample input requirements
  • Less cost-effective for sequencing low numbers of targets (1–20 targets)
  • Time-consuming for sequencing low numbers of targets (1–20 targets)

* Discovery power is the ability to identify novel variants.
† Mutation resolution is the size of the mutation identified. NGS can identify large chromosomal rearrangements down to single nucleotide variants.
‡ 10 ng DNA will produce ~1 kb with Sanger sequencing or ~300 kb with targeted resequencing (250 bp amplicon length × 1536 amplicons with an AmpliSeq for Illumina workflow)

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Efficient Variant Discovery with Targeted Gene Panels

NGS enabled Franco Taroni, MD to identify variants in a fraction of the time and at a significantly lower cost than Sanger sequencing.

Read Interview

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

NGS Revolutionizes Reproductive Genomics

Viafet uses the VeriSeq PGS Solution, enabling IVF clinics to provide fast, accurate, and efficient PGS services.

Read Interview

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Environmental DNA Offers a Powerful Look at Biodiversity

Sanger sequencing offered a "limited DNA snapshot." Now, Michael Bunce, PhD uses NGS to look at hundreds of thousands of reads per sample.

Read Interview

Sanger sequencing can be a good choice when interrogating a small region of DNA on a limited number of samples or genomic targets (~20 or fewer). Otherwise, targeted NGS is more likely to suit your needs. NGS allows you to screen more samples cost-effectively and detect multiple variants across targeted areas of the genome—an approach that would be costly and time-consuming using Sanger sequencing.

Watch this animation to see how the easy and accessible Illumina NGS technology can complement your Sanger sequencing work.

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Beginner's Guide to Next-Generation Sequencing

Considering bringing next-generation sequencing to your lab, but unsure where to start? These resources cover key topics in NGS and are designed to help you plan your first experiment.

Get Started

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

Transitioning from Sanger Sequencing to NGS

The iSeq 100 Sequencing System makes it easier and more affordable than ever to bring the power of NGS to your lab. The following example illustrates how the instrument fits into a common NGS workflow.

Sequencing

iSeq 100 System

Affordable, fast, and accessible sequencing power for targeted or small genome sequencing in any lab.

Data Analysis

Local Run Manager

An on-site software solution for creating sequencing runs, monitoring run status, and analyzing data.

Targeted Resequencing

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

This method involves isolating and sequencing a subset of genes or a genomic region of interest, which can conserve lab resources.

Whole-Genome Sequencing

Which of the following comparisons between scanners is the most likely to be true?

This method delivers a comprehensive view of genetic variation, ideal for discovery applications.

  • Advantages of High-Throughput Sequencing: Process more samples to improve statistical power, and cost-effectively run emerging data-rich methods, including single-cell and spatial analyses.
  • NGS Data Analysis: Find user-friendly tools and tips to smooth the process of analyzing sequencing data, so you can spend more time doing research and less time configuring workflows.
  • Multiomics Profiling: Combine genomic data with data from other modalities such as transcriptomics, epigenetics, and proteomics, to better connect genotype to phenotype and fuel discovery of novel drug targets.

In-Depth Guide to Targeted NGS

Learn more about how NGS-based targeted resequencing can help you identify variants in less time and for less money than Sanger sequencing.

Download Guide

What is the differences between the painting itself and the photo of the painting stored on the smartphone?

Which of the following best describes the differences between the painting itself and the photo of the painting stored on the smartphone? The photo is a digital representation of the analog painting.

What is true about the process of converting the concert's audio waves into a digital recording choose 1 answer?

What is true about the process of converting the concert's audio waves into a digital recording? If the recording equipment uses a very small sampling interval, the digital recording will be a very good representation but will not contain every detail.

Which of the following is most likely true if Jorge opts to compress the image before sending it?

Which of the following is most likely true if Jorge opts to compress the image before sending it? The image will require fewer bits in order to be represented.

Which of the following best explains how messages are typically transmitted over the Internet?

10. Which of the following best explains how messages are typically transmitted over the Internet? The message is broken into packets that are transmitted in a specified order. Each packet must be received in the order it was sent for the message to be correctly reassembled by the recipient's device.