Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro 1000M sử dụng cho Dell M4600, HP 8560W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro 2000M sử dụng cho Dell M4600, HP 8560W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro 3000M sử dụng cho Dell M6600, HP 8760W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K1000M sử dụng cho Dell M4700, HP 8570W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K2000M sử dụng cho Dell M4700, HP 8570W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K3000M sử dụng cho Dell M6700, HP 8770W
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K1100M sử dụng cho Dell M4800, HP Zbook 15 G1/G2
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K2100M sử dụng cho Dell M4800, HP Zbook 15 G1/G2
Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K3100M sử dụng cho Dell M6800, HP Zbook 17 G1/G2
Tag: Card màn hình Nvidia Quadro K1100 thay thế được cho các dòng laptop: DELL Precision M6600, M6700, M4800 Series. Dell Alienware M17x R3/R4, M18x R1/R2 Series. HP Compaq EliteBook 8770W, 8570W Series. HP Zbook 15, 17 Series. Lenovo W540. TOSHIBA TECRA W50. MSI MS-16F3 MS-16F4 MS-1762 MS-1763 Series. CLEVO P151SM P150SM P170SM P177SM P157SN P370SM P375SM and P570WM
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores384384Core clock speed705 MHz745 MHzNumber of transistors1,270 million1,270 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]45 Watt55 WattTexture fill rate22.5923.84Floating-point performance542.2 gflops572.2 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sizedInterfaceMXM-A [3.0]MXM-A [3.0]
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width128 Bit128 BitMemory clock speed2800 MHz1800 MHzMemory bandwidth44.8 GB/s28.8 GB/sShared memory--
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputsDisplay Port1.2no data
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus++3D Vision Pro+no dataMosaic+no datanView Display Management+no dataOptimus+no data
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX1212 [11_0]Shader Model55.1OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan++CUDA++
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 7% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 13% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 2% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 28% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 5% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 7% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
K2000M outperforms K1100M by 8% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Unigine Heaven 3.0
This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
K1100M outperforms K2000M by 3% in Unigine Heaven 3.0.
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] 18 Mh/s 18 Mh/s
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD18 25
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 20775−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Full HD Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 56−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 20775−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 54−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 48−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 35−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 26−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1
Full HD High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 56−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 20775−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 54−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 48−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Hitman 35−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 26−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1
Full HD Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Battlefield 56−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Cyberpunk 20775−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 54−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 48−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt4
−50%
6−7
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 36−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 21−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
1440p Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 20771−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 55−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 43−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 33−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 21−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
4K Ultra Preset
Far Cry 54−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 43−4 2−3
This is how K1100M and K2000M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- K2000M is 38.9% faster than K1100M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K1100M is 50% faster than the K2000M.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K2000M is 50% faster than the K1100M.
All in all, in popular games:
- K1100M is ahead in 19 tests [39%]
- K2000M is ahead in 1 test [2%]
- there's a draw in 29 tests [59%]
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 2.79 2.61 Recency 23 July 2013 1 June 2012 Cost $109.94 $265.27 Memory bandwidth 44.8 28.8 Power consumption [TDP] 45 Watt 55 Watt
We couldn't decide between Quadro K1100M and Quadro K2000M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
Quadro K1100M
Quadro K2000M
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA Quadro K2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.