So sánh geforce gt520m với hd620 năm 2024

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2448CUDA coresno data48Core clock speed300 MHz740 / 600 MHzBoost clock speed1150 MHzno dataNumber of transistors189 million585 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm40 nmPower consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 WattTexture fill rate27.605.9 billion/secFloating-point performanceno data129.02 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce GT 520M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR3Maximum RAM amount32 GB1536 MBMemory bus widthSystem Shared64 BitMemory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHzMemory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/sShared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+Quick Sync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 APIShader Model6.45.1OpenGL4.64.5OpenCL2.11.1Vulkan1.1.103N/ACUDAno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 620 2.66

+269%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 269% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

UHD Graphics 620 1030

+268%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 268% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 7330

+221%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 221% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

UHD Graphics 620 1744

+247%

UHD Graphics 620 outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 247% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24−27

+243%

7

−243%

Full HD13

+8.3%

12

−8.3%

1200p24−27

+243%

7

−243%

1440p16

+300%

4−5

−300%

4K8

+300%

2−3

−300%

Full HD Low Preset

Cyberpunk 20776 3−4

Full HD Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey8

+300%

2−3

−300%

Battlefield 55−6

+400%

1−2

−400%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14

+50%

8−9

−50%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 57

+600%

1−2

−600%

Far Cry New Dawn6

+500%

1−2

−500%

Forza Horizon 412

+300%

3−4

−300%

Hitman 35−6

+400%

1−2

−400%

Horizon Zero Dawn4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Red Dead Redemption 25

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider6

+0%

6−7

+0%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

Full HD High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 0−1 Battlefield 55−6

+400%

1−2

−400%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14

+50%

8−9

−50%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 56

+500%

1−2

−500%

Far Cry New Dawn5

+400%

1−2

−400%

Forza Horizon 46−7

+500%

1−2

−500%

Hitman 35−6

+400%

1−2

−400%

Horizon Zero Dawn4−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Metro Exodus4

+300%

1−2

−300%

Red Dead Redemption 26−7

+100%

3−4

−100%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10

+50%

6−7

−50%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt6

+100%

3−4

−100%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

Full HD Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 0−1 Battlefield 55−6

+400%

1−2

−400%

Cyberpunk 20775−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Far Cry 56

+500%

1−2

−500%

Far Cry New Dawn3−4 0−1 Forza Horizon 46−7

+500%

1−2

−500%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3

+0%

3−4

+0%

Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1

1440p High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Hitman 35−6

+66.7%

3−4

−66.7%

Horizon Zero Dawn10−11

+25%

8−9

−25%

Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7

+50%

4−5

−50%

1440p Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 20771−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

Far Cry 54−5

+300%

1−2

−300%

Forza Horizon 41−2 0−1 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3−4

+200%

1−2

−200%

4K High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3

+100%

1−2

−100%

Hitman 33−4

+200%

1−2

−200%

Horizon Zero Dawn8−9

+0%

8−9

+0%

Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1

4K Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey1−2 0−1 Assassin's Creed Valhalla1−2 0−1 Cyberpunk 20770−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5

+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Far Cry New Dawn6−7

+20%

5−6

−20%


This is how UHD Graphics 620 and GT 520M compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 243% faster than GT 520M

1080p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 8.3% faster than GT 520M

1200p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 243% faster than GT 520M

1440p resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 300% faster than GT 520M

4K resolution:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is 300% faster than GT 520M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 620 is 300% faster than the GT 520M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 620 is ahead in 21 test (84%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (16%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.66 0.72 Recency 1 September 2017 5 January 2011 Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1536 MB Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

The UHD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


UHD Graphics 620

GeForce GT 520M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


Rate Intel UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh geforce gt520m với hd620 năm 2024

So sánh geforce gt520m với hd620 năm 2024

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

So sánh geforce gt520m với hd620 năm 2024

So sánh geforce gt520m với hd620 năm 2024

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.