How did imperialism contribute to global migrations in the nineteenth century?

This period was one of rapid, seismic change, with old relationships and arrangements in society shifting in the face of a modernising, globalising economy. At the same time many groups, from the working class and women of Britain to those who were enslaved, were involved in battles for increased rights.

Black Britons at the time of enslavement and emancipation, and in the industrial age. We know from a wide range of sources that black people lived and worked at all levels of society in all parts of the country. Of the few whose backgrounds we know, many were brought from enslavement in the Caribbean by their owners, while others may have been descended from long-standing African residents. In the case of those enslaved, their rights in Britain were  ambiguous: although slavery was legal across the Empire, within Britain the law neither permitted nor banned slavery. Some black people were kept in conditions of enslavement by their owners, who posted advertisements for their recapture when they ran away. On the other hand, black people worked in a number of different trades, their ranks including a publican, a lighthouse owner, an Old Bailey constable and large numbers in the army and navy. Ignatius Sancho, born on a slave ship, became a Westminster shopkeeper, classical composer and property owner eligible to vote in elections.

The 1772 Somerset court case ruled that a formerly enslaved man was free while in Britain but not if he returned to Jamaica. The Sierra Leone project aimed to resettle in Africa the ‘Black Loyalists’ – former slaves who had fought for Britain in the American War of Independence and who were subsequently freed, but ended up destitute on London’s streets. Some supporters saw the resettlement project as a humanitarian attempt to right the wrongs of slavery, while others saw it as an opportunity to get rid of the black poor: it ended up spoiled by corruption, exploitation and disaster. Most black residents clearly shared the lives of the other local poor with its few freedoms and many hardships. They also lived in the shadow of the violent trade in enslaved Africans and the rising tide of racist ideas that accompanied it.

Some black immigrants, formerly enslaved, were instrumental in abolition, either through writing, such as Mary Prince and Ukawsaw Gronniosaw (see: ‘From slavery to freedom’), or activism (Olaudah Equiano and Ottobah Cugoano). Others – such as Robert Wedderburn and the Cato Street conspirator William Davidson – saw themselves as fighting for the liberation both of enslaved Africans and the British working class. Following emancipation in the 1830s, the tradition of black radicals continued with, for example, William Cuffay the Chartist leader and the anti-colonialists of the late nineteenth century. After abolition, official records tended no longer to note whether someone was black and it is harder for us to identify the number of black people in the Victorian working class. Bearing in mind how widely spread across the country black people were, and the frequency of intermarriage, it is likely that considerable numbers of ‘white’ British people today have black ancestry.

Lascar and other merchant seamen. With the demise of the East India Company after 1857 and the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, increasing numbers of private shipping lines brought raw materials and traded goods from Asia to Britain, hiring men – known as ‘lascars’ – to work on their ships. These Bengali, Chinese, Malay, Yemeni, Gujarati and Somali seamen were hired on low wages to work in very difficult conditions. On arrival in British ports they were often abandoned and found it hard to find employment for a return trip because of opposition from the seamen’s union, which saw them as taking white workers’ jobs and undercutting their wages. Forced to survive as best they could, often living in boarding houses, many married white women and, slowly, multiracial working-class communities developed near the docks in Cardiff, Liverpool, Glasgow, Hull, South Shields and East London. Negative racial stereotyping of these areas as ‘sinister’, ‘dangerous’ and ‘criminal’ was common and forced families to develop a resilience in the face of hostility.

At the same time, Indian and Chinese women ('ayahs' and 'amahs') continued to be brought as nannies and housekeepers for wealthy white families (see: 'A home for the ayahs'). British rule in India also enabled many of the Indian upper classes to come to Britain for education or business. They included doctors, lawyers, restaurateurs, sportsmen, aristocrats, Britain’s first female law student, Cornelia Sorabji, and politicians – two of whom were elected to Parliament by mainly white constituencies.

European immigrants to industrial Britain. Britain’s industrial economy depended on the factory system centred in the northwest, and this in turn demanded mass labour. Forced by poverty to leave home, migrant workers came in their hundreds of thousands from rural England, Scotland and especially Ireland. Forced to leave home by agricultural decline, the lack of employment opportunity and aggressive, often English, landlords, Irish families emigrated in their millions to North America and to Britain. Here they dug canals and docks, laid railway tracks and roads and worked the machines in the Lancashire textile mills. Irish migration reached its height during the horrors of the potato famine of the 1840s, many arriving on the ‘coffin ships’ in a state of starvation and forced to live in extreme conditions in the slums of cities such as Liverpool (see: 'The Irish in early industrial Britain'). Anti-Irish racism – mixed with anti-Catholic feeling, resentment of terrorist acts by some Irish nationalists, and tensions with English workers over pay and strike actions – was common and stoked up in the Press. Irish migrants also included writers such as Oscar Wilde and George Bernard Shaw, and Thomas Barnardo, the founder of the children’s charity.

Poverty was another key factor in mass migration by families from southern Italy to cities such as Manchester, Glasgow and London. While many became factory workers, Italians also thrived in the food business, particularly the ice-cream trade, and in street entertainment. They too faced discrimination and negative publicity, including health scares about the dishes in which ice-cream was sold, but they settled permanently in areas such as London’s Clerkenwell and Ancoats in Manchester, which became known as ‘Little Italy’.

By 1900 the largest immigrant community in Britain was of German origin. While Germans existed at all levels of society they were particularly prominent as food traders for their bakeries and the delikatessens, which helped introduce sausages to the British breakfast. There were also several German entrepreneurs – some of them Jewish – who took advantage of Britain’s business opportunities. The firms they started – including Reuters, ICI, Schweppes and General Electric – became world famous.

A place of safety. Although none of Britain’s poorest men – and no women – yet had the vote, greater political freedoms  had been won in Britain than in most other countries. Many political activists in danger in their homelands came to Britain as asylum seekers for short or longer periods. They included the Italian nationalist Giuseppe Mazzini, German communists Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, and African-American antislavery activists Ellen Craft and Frederick Douglass.

Towards the end of the nineteenth century there was a new mass migration, this time of Eastern European Jews fleeing anti-Semitic pogroms. They settled first in the cheaper areas of larger cities, many working in the garment trade, which could employ whole families as tailors and seamstresses, often working long hours in sweatshops. Many became politically active, playing a key role in working-class action such as the tailors’ strike. The Jewish clothing trade in East London, Leeds and other cities enabled poorer British families to afford new clothing for the first time, and some small businesses established by Jewish migrants grew to become household names such as Marks & Spencer and Burton. One legacy of this influx of Jewish migrants is now seen as typically English: fish and chips.

Meanwhile mass emigration to the USA and Canada from the British Isles continued, in many cases following the same trajectory (fleeing poverty and seeking a better life) as those coming in.

Migrants building Britain

As in previous centuries, immigrants brought considerable economic benefit to Britain. As described above, its factories, transport links, food and clothing businesses were transformed by their contributions. Because of the need for labour there was very little immigration control. By the end of the nineteenth century, however, anti-immigrant feeling was again rising, once more stirred up by sections of the press and some politicians. Antagonism – particularly against Asian seamen and Eastern European Jews – led to growing calls for laws restricting immigration, setting the scene for the century to come.

What is one way imperialism contributed to global migrations in the nineteenth century?

Imperialism led to a global economy that encouraged migration in search of opportunity. Industrialization pushed many people to urban centers. The demand for new forms of labor after the abolition of slavery led to new forms of forced, coerced, and semi-coerced migration.

Why did global migration occur in the 19th century?

In the late 1800s, people in many parts of the world decided to leave their homes and immigrate to the United States. Fleeing crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes, and famine, many came to the U. S. because it was perceived as the land of economic opportunity.

How did industrialization play a role in increased migrations in this time period?

With the growth of factories and the demand for unskilled labor, immigrants, primarily young men in the working years, continued to be the ideal source of labor. Immigrants were generally more willing to accept lower wages and inferior working conditions than native born workers (Zolberg 2006: 69).

Why were there large migrations of labor in the 19th century?

The main reason for migrating during the 19th century was to find work. On one hand this involved migration from the countryside to the growing industrial cities, on the other it involved movement from one country, in this case Britain, to another.