So sánh graphic 630 vs graphic 4000 năm 2024
|
Intel HD Graphics là dòng iGPU ( hay vi xử lý đồ hoạ tích hợp ) của Intel lần đầu được giới thiệu cùng với dòng Core I thế hệ đầu tiên dành cho những mẫu laptop doanh nhân hoặc laptop tầm trung - giá rẻ. Intel HD Graphics là một bước cải tiến so với dòng GPU GMA3100MX hay GMA4500MHD được trang bị cùng với dòng Core 2 Duo cũ . Bằng việc trang bị cùng với CPU , Intel HD Graphics sẽ có nhiệt độ thấp hơn so với card rời vì có hiệu suất thấp do được trang bị lên những mẫu máy giá rẻ . Về sức mạnh , Intel HD Graphics có hiệu suất đạt ngang hàng hoặc hơn nếu so với những mẫu card rời cũ hơn . Ví dụ , Intel HD Graphics 3000 sẽ có hiệu suất hoạt động nhỉnh hơn Nvidia Geforce 330M ... Nhưng yếu tố quan trọng nhất đó là về vi xử lý và RAM . Thường những vi xử lý Core I dòng M sẽ mạnh hơn Core I dòng U về xung nhịp , dòng Celeron , Pentium , Antom sẽ được trang bị iGPU yếu hơn rõ rệt so với dòng Core I 3 , 5 , 7 . RAM cũng là một yếu tố quyết định , thường những dòng Intel HD Graphics ra mắt trước năm 2014 sẽ có RAM Share chỉ là 2GB , nhưng từ 2014 đã có thể share đến 8GB , vì vậy muốn card xử lý tốt hơn chúng ta cần nâng cấp cho laptop ít nhất 2GB RAM . Về so sánh đối với dòng Intel HD Graphics thông dụng dành cho Core I : UHD 630 > UHD 620 > HD 620 > HD 530 > HD 520 > HD 4600 > HD 5500 > HD 4400 > HD 4000 > HD 4200 > HD 3000 . Về so sánh đối với dòng Intel HD Graphics thông dụng dành cho Celeron , Pentium , Antom : UHD 605 > UHD 600 > HD 505 > HD 500 > HD 2500 > HD 2000 . Những lưu ý khi chọn mua laptop có Intel HD Graphics : + Nên chọn từ dòng Core I3 ( tốt nhất dòng M ) Show
+ Tránh mua máy Notebook nếu có chơi game + Tránh chọn Pentium hay Antom có mã sau nhỏ . + RAM ít nhất 4GB ( có hỗ trợ nâng càng tốt ) + Nếu chơi game nên chọn Core I5 hoặc máy có Intel HD Graphics 4000 trở lên + Tránh mua máy có card Iris Graphics , vì tiền đó đủ để mua máy có card rời . Những lưu ý khi dùng Intel HD Graphics : + Nâng cấp RAM nếu có thể ( máy có ít nhất 6GB DDR3 1600 ) + Tạo không gian tản nhiệt cho máy + Khi chơi game nên reset máy để có ram trống càng nhiều càng tốt + Cắm nguồn khi chơi game + Set đồ hoạ thấp nhất có thể + Bật hiệu năng cao trên Win10 + Chỉnh Performance trong Intel HD Graphics Control Panel Game có thể chơi : + Game 2D + Game 3D cũ trước 2010 ( game càng xấu càng tốt ) Tác vụ khuyến nghị : + Văn phòng + Youtube + App game Để biết rõ hơn máy mình dùng Intel HD Graphics nào hãy tìm kiếm trên Google ( nhớ dịch sang tiếng việt ) : ( tên vi xử lý ) + notebookcheck . VD : antom x5 z8500 notebookcheck . Sau đó kiếm : ( tên GPU ) + Techpowerup VD : hd 5500 Techpowerup Nếu không có kết quả hãy kiếm : ( tên GPU ) + notebookcheck VD. : Intel HD Graphics Bay Trail notebookcheck . Trên đây là thông tin tham khảo , có độ chính xác 90% . Cảm ơn đã đọc bài . Tên GPU Ivy Bridge GT2 Coffee Lake GT2 Kiến trúc Generation 7.0 Generation 9.5 Nhà sản xuất Intel Intel Kích thước tiến trình 22 nm 14 nm+++ Bóng bán dẫn 1,200 million unknown Kích thước chết 133 mm² unknown Đồ hoạ tích hợpTốc độ xung nhịpXung nhịp cơ bản 650 MHz 350 MHz Tăng xung nhịp 1050 MHz 1000 MHz xung nhịp bộ nhớ System Shared System Shared Bộ nhớKích thước bộ nhớ System Shared System Shared Loại bộ nhớ System Shared System Shared Bộ nhớ Bus System Shared System Shared Băng thông System Dependent System Dependent cấu hình kết xuấtCác đơn vị bóng 128 192 Đơn vị xử lý bề mặt 16 24 ROPs 2 3 Đơn vị xử lý 16 24 Hiệu năng lý thuyếtTỷ lệ điểm ảnh 2.100 GPixel/s 3.000 GPixel/s Tốc độ làm đầy vật liệu 16.80 GTexel/s 24.00 GTexel/s FP32 (float) hiệu năng 268.8 GFLOPS 384.0 GFLOPS FP64 (double) hiệu năng 67.20 GFLOPS (1:4) 96.00 GFLOPS (1:4) FP16 (half) hiệu năng — 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) Thiết kế bảng mạchChiều rộng khe IGP IGP Công suất thiết kế unknown 15 W Đầu ra No outputs No outputs Tính năng đồ hoạDirectX 11.1 (11_0) 12 (12_1) OpenGL 4.0 4.6 OpenCL 1.2 3.0 Vulkan 1.0 1.2 Mô hình đổ bóng 5.0 6.4 General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores2416Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHzBoost clock speed1150 MHz1350 MHzNumber of transistors189 million1,200 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm22 nmPower consumption (TDP)15 WattunknownTexture fill rate26.4020.80Floating-point performance441.6 gflops33.6 gflops Size and compatibilityInformation on HD Graphics 630 and HD Graphics 4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16WidthIGPno data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System SharedMaximum RAM amount64 GBSystem SharedMemory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speedSystem SharedSystem SharedShared memory++ Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)Shader Model6.45.0OpenGL4.64.0OpenCL2.11.2Vulkan+1.1.80 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. HD Graphics 630 3.09 +164% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 164% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% HD Graphics 630 1197 +164% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 164% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 630 7685 +160% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 160% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 630 1729 +231% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 231% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 630 1067 +122% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 122% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 630 9715 +158% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 158% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% HD Graphics 630 101178 +128% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 128% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% HD Graphics 630 outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by 156% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p30−35 +150% 12 −150% Full HD15 +36.4% 11 −36.4% 1440p64 +167% 24−27 −167% 4K13 +225% 4−5 −225% Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20776−7 3−4 Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey5 +400% 1−2 −400% Battlefield 57−8 +250% 2−3 −250% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +44.4% 9−10 −44.4% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 56 +200% 2−3 −200% Far Cry New Dawn5 +400% 1−2 −400% Forza Horizon 410−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Hitman 36−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Horizon Zero Dawn5−6 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider5 −20% 6−7 +20% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Battlefield 57−8 +250% 2−3 −250% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +44.4% 9−10 −44.4% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 55−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Forza Horizon 410−11 +233% 3−4 −233% Hitman 36−7 +500% 1−2 −500% Horizon Zero Dawn5−6 0−1 Metro Exodus2 +100% 1−2 −100% Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider9−10 +50% 6−7 −50% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey4−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Battlefield 57−8 +250% 2−3 −250% Cyberpunk 20776−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Far Cry 55−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Far Cry New Dawn5−6 +400% 1−2 −400% Forza Horizon 410−11 +233% 3−4 −233% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt7−8 +133% 3−4 −133% Watch Dogs: Legion1−2 0−1 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Hitman 36−7 +50% 4−5 −50% Horizon Zero Dawn9−10 +28.6% 7−8 −28.6% Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20771−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Far Cry 54−5 +300% 1−2 −300% Forza Horizon 43−4 +200% 1−2 −200% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt0−1 0−1 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3 +0% 2−3 +0% Hitman 33−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Red Dead Redemption 21−2 0−1 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey0−1 0−1 Far Cry 54−5 +33.3% 3−4 −33.3% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Forza Horizon 43−4 +200% 1−2 −200% This is how HD Graphics 630 and HD Graphics 4000 compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 3.09 1.17 Recency 1 January 2017 23 March 2011 Maximum RAM amount 64 GB System Shared Pipelines / CUDA cores 24 16 Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests. Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while HD Graphics 4000 is a notebook one. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. HD Graphics 630 HD Graphics 4000 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate Intel HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
