Which of the following is/are factor(s) in explaining the formation of interest groups?

Abstract

The role of interest groups in the political process has been the subject of much analysis in both political science and economics. However, few studies have examined directly the factors which influence the variation in interest group formation across industrial sectors and between countries. Using data on 75 industrial sectors in 10 countries, we examine the way in which variations in interest group formation are explained by variations in industrial and political characteristics. In cross-sectional empirical relationships we test for the significance of a variety of industry and political variables. Our results indicate that industry characteristics such as the proportion of total demand purchased by households and the concentration ratio are related to variations in interest group formation. We discuss the implications that our results have for recent theoretical work on the effect of interest groups on economic policy.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Singapore)

References

  • Anderson, K. (1980). The political market for government assistance to Australian manufacturing industries. Economic Record 56 (June): 132–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. (1981). Voluntary pressure groups. Economica 48(May): 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.F. (1984). Trade policies in developed countries. In R.W. Jones and P.B. Kenen (Eds.), Handbook of international economics 1, 571–619. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (3): 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1985). Public policies, pressure groups, and dead weight costs. Journal of Public Economics 28: 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J.M. (1984). The interest group society. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1950). The unity of political and economic science. Economic Journal (September): 506–514.

  • Blais, A. (1986). The political economy of public subsidies. Comparative Political Studies 19(2): 201–217.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E. (1976). Economic models of political choice: Canada's tariff structure. Canadian Journal of Economics 9(2): 278–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigler, A.J. and Loomis, B.A. (Eds.) (1986). Interest group politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, C. and Tullock, G. (1980). Firm size and political power. In J.J. Siegfried (Ed.), The economics of firm size, market structure, and social performance, 43–71. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P.J., Mueller, D.C. and Murrell, P. (1989). Electoral politics, interest groups, and the size of government. Economic Inquiry forthcoming.

  • Denzau, A.T. and Munger, M.C. (1986). Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented. American Political Science Review 80(1): 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, D.C. and Caves, R.E. (1983). Market structure and political influence: New data on political expenditures, activity and success. Economic Inquiry 21(1): 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B.L. (1983). Efficient redistribution through commodity markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(May): 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, E. (1983). The political economy of protection in Italy: Some empirical evidence. World Bank Staff Working Papers No. 567.

  • Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, I., MacDonald, G.M. and Slivinski, A. (1985). Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent. Journal of Political Economy 93(5): 837–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, B.A. and Cigler, A.J. (1986). Introduction: The changing nature of interest group politics. In A.J. Cigler and B.A. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics, 1–26. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review: 298–310.

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S.P. (1982). Comment. In J.N. Bhagwati (Ed.), Import competition and response, 286–290. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M.C. (1974). Group size, homogeneity, and the aggregate provision of a pure public good under Cournot behavior. Public Choice 18(2): 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1980). The organization of interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. and Murrell, P. (1986). Interest groups and the size of government. Public Choice 48(2): 125–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, P. (1984). An examination of the factors affecting the formation of interest groups in OECD countries. Public Choice 43: 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1971). Manual of political economy. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 5(2): 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R.H. (1975). Interest groups. In F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (Eds.), Nongovernmental politics, 171–228. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1935). Politics, pressures and the tariff. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review 55(5): 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K.L. and Tierney, J.T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. (1974). Free riders and collective action: An appendix to theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economies and Management Science 5(2): 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truman, D.B. (1951). The governmental process. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.W. (1973). Political organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Guide to Trade Associations (1982). Second Edition. Munich: K.G. Saur.

  • Zardkoohi, A. (1988). Market structure and campaign contributions: Does concentration matter? A reply. Public Choice 58(2): 187–191.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Maryland, 20742, College Park, MD

    Brendan Kennelly & Peter Murrell

Authors

  1. Brendan Kennelly

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Murrell

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

For helpful comments, we would like to thank Antonio Estache, Bruce Gardner, Dennis Mueller, Mancur Olson, and participants at the meetings of the Public Choice Society and the Southern Economic Association. The International Institute of Management of Berlin, Paul Geroski, Neal Kennedy, Alexis Jacquemin, Kenneth Platto, Joachim Schwalbach, and Hideki Yamawaki helped in providing data. The Computer Science Center of the University of Maryland is acknowledged for provision of computational resources.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kennelly, B., Murrell, P. Industry characteristics and interest group formation: An empirical study. Public Choice 70, 21–40 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239342

Download citation

  • Received: 06 October 1989

  • Accepted: 13 February 1990

  • Issue Date: April 1991

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239342

Keywords

  • Empirical Study
  • Economic Policy
  • Concentration Ratio
  • Public Finance
  • Interest Group

What are the 4 functions of an interest group?

Interest group functions.
Advocacy. Advocacy includes scrutinising proposed legislation, making submissions to Parliament's select committees, lobbying government ministers and their advisors, and seeking to influence public opinion. ... .
Policy formulation. ... .
Membership support..

What are the 3 main types of lobbying?

Lobbying Forms. Lobbying takes a wide variety of forms, depending on what kinds of issues organized interests work for and whom they try to influence. Berry (1977) grouped various forms of lobbying into three general categories: direct lobbying, grassroots lobbying, and electoral lobbying.

Which of the following are key functions of interest groups?

The two principal functions of interest groups are representation and education.

Which of the following are examples of interest groups quizlet?

Terms in this set (16).
The American Farm Bureau Federation. ... .
American Federation of Labor: Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) ... .
National Education Association (NEA) ... .
American Bar Association. ... .
The American Medical Association (AMA) ... .
Audobon Society. ... .
Sierra Club. ... .
National Rifle Association (NRA).