The existence assertion for accounts payable includes:

Management assertions are claims made by members of management regarding certain aspects of a business. The concept is primarily used in regard to the audit of a company's financial statements, where the auditors rely upon a variety of assertions regarding the business. The auditors test the validity of these assertions by conducting a number of audit tests. Management assertions fall into the following three classifications.

Transaction-Level Assertions

The following five items are classified as assertions related to transactions, mostly in regard to the income statement:

  • Accuracy. The assertion is that the full amounts of all transactions were recorded, without error.

  • Classification. The assertion is that all transactions have been recorded within the correct accounts in the general ledger.

  • Completeness. The assertion is that all business events to which the company was subjected were recorded.

  • Cutoff. The assertion is that all transactions were recorded within the correct reporting period.

  • Occurrence. The assertion is that recorded business transactions actually took place.

Account Balance Assertions

The following four items are classified as assertions related to the ending balances in accounts, and so relate primarily to the balance sheet:

  • Completeness. The assertion is that all reported asset, liability, and equity balances have been fully reported.

  • Existence. The assertion is that all account balances exist for assets, liabilities, and equity.

  • Rights and obligations. The assertion is that the entity has the rights to the assets it owns and is obligated under its reported liabilities.

  • Valuation. The assertion is that all asset, liability, and equity balances have been recorded at their proper valuations.

Presentation and Disclosure Assertions

The following five items are classified as assertions related to the presentation of information within the financial statements, as well as the accompanying disclosures:

  • Accuracy. The assertion is that all information disclosed is in the correct amounts, and which reflect their proper values.

  • Completeness. The assertion is that all transactions that should be disclosed have been disclosed.

  • Occurrence. The assertion is that disclosed transactions have indeed occurred.

  • Rights and obligations. The assertion is that disclosed rights and obligations actually relate to the reporting entity.

  • Understandability. The assertion is that the information included in the financial statements has been appropriately presented and is clearly understandable.

There is a fair amount of duplication in the types of assertions across the three categories; however, each assertion type is intended for a different aspect of the financial statements, with the first set related to the income statement, the second set to the balance sheet, and the third set to the accompanying disclosures.

If the auditor is unable to obtain a letter containing management assertions from the senior management of a client, the auditor is unlikely to proceed with audit activities. One reason for not proceeding with an audit is that the inability to obtain a management assertions letter could be an indicator that management has engaged in fraud in producing the financial statements.

The primary test to confirm the completeness assertion for accounts payable and other liabilities is to perform a “search for unrecorded liabilities”. Basically, the audit team obtains a listing of all cash disbursements made for a period of time after year-end.

The audit team then requests the invoice for the cash disbursement and determines if the invoice was properly included or properly excluded from the accounts payable balance at year-end.

The existence assertion for accounts payable includes:

Previous Question

Next Question


Back To All Questions

You might also be interested in...How to test the completeness assertion for expenses?

The primary concern for expenses is that the company has not recorded all expenses in the financial statements. By not recording certain expenses, the company can inflate profit. The audit team can trace invoices or cash disbursements to the general ledger (i.e. the search for unrecorded liabilities).

In this article, we will cover the audit procedures for Accounts Payable. In most circumstances, we commonly call Accounts Payable as Trade Payable. It is really important to perform proper audit procedures for Accounts payable as this is a critical portion of financial records and considered to be one of the high-risk items in the financial statements. In the accounts payable audit there is a high-risk of misstatement due to fraud or error, so strong accounts payable audit procedures are required to ensure the accuracy.

Objectives of Accounts Payable Audit

The main objectives of accounts payable audit are as follow:

  • To ensure completeness of the accounts payable
  • To ensure the existence of the accounts payable reported in the Balance Sheet
  • To ensure  that there is enforceable rights and obligations for the accounts payable
  • To ensure the accuracy of accounts recorded in the Balance Sheet
  • To ensure the valuation and allocation has been properly carried out for the recording of accounts payable
  • Last but not least, the objective of auditing accounts payable is to ensure that there is proper presentation and disclosures in the financial statements.

Risks and Control Deficiencies in Relation to the Accounts Payable

In this section, we cover the risks for the accounts payable as well as the control deficiencies (sometimes called internal control deficiencies) that may happen for the accounting and management of accounts payable.

Below are the key risks associated with the accounts payable that we commonly encounter so far:

  • An entity or management may intentionally account for or understate the accounts payable
  • There is risk of duplicate payment to vendors as well as the payments were made to inappropriate suppliers or vendors.
  • There is risk of late or missed payment to suppliers or vendors. This may result in penalty from vendors or further reassessment on tightening the credit terms in the future.
  • Similarly, there is also possible risk on missing the accruals.
  • There is a risk of possible fraud both internal (among internal staff) and external parties where collusion happen between staff and vendors.

In addition, there are also control deficiencies that auditor should assess and detect. The control deficiencies give rise to the possible fraud as well as other problems that result in the misstatement of accounts payable recorded and presented in the Balance Sheet. Below are the examples of control deficiencies that we commonly encounter during the course of the audit:

  • There is no proper segregation of duties between the person to approve the purchases, record invoices into system as well as the person who make the payment. In addition, the person who perform the reconciliation on accounts payable is also not segregated.
  • There is no properly review from other person before processing the payment.
  • No properly reconciliation between accounts payable listing to General Ledger (GL) or to Trial Balance (TB).
  • There might be only one person to process the electronic payment or transfer (TT). This raise doubt of internal control deficiencies.

READ:  What is Walkthrough Test?

The above problems both on risk and control deficiencies are they key areas that shall need to take into account and perform the relevant audit procedures for the audit of the accounts payable.

In the later section of this article, we will cover the key assertions as well as the audit procedures for the audit of accounts payable.  

Key Assertions of Accounts Payable Audit

As mentioned above, the audit on accounts payable is very important as it is the key and material items in the financial statements. In order to audit the accounts payable, it requires to use the combination of analytical procedures and tests of detail or substantive audit procedures for accounts payable. Typically, we perform the audit of accounts payable in conjunction with the audit of purchases. Thus, in this section, we will take some assertions that we usually test in combination with accounts payable. Below are the key audit assertions for accounts payable and we will group these assertions into 3 main types:

Financial Statements AssertionsAudit Objectives in Relation to the AssertionsAssertion about classes of transactionsOccurrence: This is to ensure that all purchase transactions are actually incurred and related to the entity.
Completeness: This is to ensure that the accounts payable balance reported on the balance sheet includes all payable transactions occurring during the period.  
Accuracy: This is to ensure that all purchase transactions have been appropriately recorded at the correct amount.
Cut-Off: This is to ensure that all transactions have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
Classification: Auditors need to check if payable balances are properly classified in subclasses and debits and credits are accurately applied.Assertions about the account balance as at the year-endExistence: The existence assertion means that the accounts payable balance recognized in the financial statements actually exists at the reporting date.
Rights and Obligations: The rights and obligations assertion means that the company actually owes a liability for accounts payable at the reporting date.
Completeness: This is to ensure that the accounts payable reported on the Balance Sheet includes all accounts payable transactions occurring during the period.
Valuation and Allocation: The valuation assertion is ensuring the amount is correctly recorded.  Assertions about presentation and disclosureThe combination of Occurrence, Rights and Obligations: For all these assertions, we want to ensure that the entity being audited has properly disclosed all events and transactions relating to the accounts payable and those have actually incurred and pertain to the entity.
Completeness: This is to ensure that the entity has included all required disclosures.
Classification and Understandability: This is to ensure that all accounts payable are properly presented and all required disclosures have been clearly expressed.
Accuracy and Valuation: This is to ensure that all financial and other information have been disclosed fairly at the appropriate amounts.

Key Audit Procedures for Accounts Payable Audit

In order to easily understand about each types of audit procedure, we will group all those audit procedures into 9 categories as below:

READ:  Self-Interest Threat to Independence and Objectivity of Auditors

Please note that in one audit procedure is able to ensure one or more audit assertions. Thus, you might see the same audit procedure for each group of assertions in this section.

Completeness

Under this section, the auditor perform the audit procedures to ensure and confirm accuracy and valuation which is part of the presentation and disclosure assertion of the accounts payable. Below are the audit procedures that audit may carries out to ensure this assertion.

What are the assertions for accounts payable?

The primary relevant accounts payable and expense assertions are:.
Existence..
Completeness..
Cutoff..
Occurrence..

What is existence assertion?

Existence. The assertion of existence is the assertion that the assets, liabilities, and shareholder equity balances appearing on a company's financial statements exist as stated at the end of the accounting period that the financial statement covers.

How to test for completeness assertion in accounts payable?

The primary method for testing the completeness of accounts payable is to search for unrecorded liabilities. This is done by obtaining a list of all cash disbursements made after year-end.

Which of the following is the most important audit assertion for accounts payable?

Ordinarily, the most significant assertion relating to accounts payable is: Completeness.