What was a major problem with the trait approach to leadership?
Back to Blog You might’ve heard the phrase “a born leader.” If you look at history, some of the world’s most prominent leaders may share some common traits. Most effective leaders have confidence, strong decision-making skills, and are good with people. Most great leaders have strong interpersonal skills, high emotional intelligence, and assertiveness. At a quick glance, it might make you think that leaders are born, not developed. The trait theory of leadership is a concept that leaders are born with distinct characteristics. In other words, leaders have inheritable traits. Early research introduced that this theory of leadership innately lives within certain people. But here’s where the controversy begins. Are certain people born leaders? Are potential leaders only those who are born with key characteristics or traits? At BetterUp, we believe that everyone has the ability to reach their full potential. A big part of self-actualization is building skills, investing in personal development, and growing as a whole person. So, while the trait theory of leadership might sound like an easy way to solve your leadership problems, does it actually hold truth? What sort of leadership models can you count on to develop leaders in your organization? Are people really born leaders? Let’s dig into what defines the trait theory of leadership. We’ll also talk about some key leadership traits you can develop — and debunk some myths about trait leadership. Before we get into the validity of the trait theory of leadership, let’s understand it. What is the trait theory of leadership?The trait theory of leadership is the concept that leaders are born with key characteristics or traits. Researcher Thomas Carlyle first proposed the theory in the 1800s. The trait theory of leadership is also referred to as the Great Man Theory of Leadership, which was studied by researcher Thomas Carlyle. When we look at Carlyle’s body of research, it’s not empirically validated. While it’s one of the oldest theories of leadership, the research was simply not vetted before the theory took off. When Carlyle first introduced this theory, he looked at popular historical figures. For example, he compared leaders (all men) like Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, and Napoleon Bonaparte. The conclusion was drawn that these “great leaders” were born with innate characteristics of leadership. And while it’s undeniable that these leaders, on paper, share many of the same set of traits, the concept hasn’t stood the test of time. At BetterUp, we’ve studied how leadership qualities can be developed. And science tells us that the trait theory of leadership has its flaws. But before we get too deep into whether or not the theory has legs to stand on, let’s look at some of the key leadership traits. What are some of the leadership traits?While we know that today, the trait theory of leadership doesn’t hold much weight, there are key leadership qualities that we can identify. Here are 10 leadership skills that good leaders possess:
What are some pros and cons of the trait leadership theory?While we’re not all born with personal characteristics that may innately make us great leaders, there are some pros and cons. Here are nine pros and cons to consider when looking at this leadership style. 3 pros of the trait leadership theory
6 cons of the trait leadership theory
10 examples of trait theory of leadershipMany researchers went on to study Carlyle’s initial theory of trait leadership. One such researcher was Ralph Stogdill, who took Carlyle’s study as a jumping point to looking into this trait approach. Let’s look at some of Stogdill’s research to help identify some examples of trait theory leadership. Stogdill conducted a survey that identified traits that were positively associated with leadership. These include:
You’ll notice these are all positive traits that are found in many leaders. But these traits are skills that people can build, especially with the help of coaching. Use BetterUp to build better leadersIf your organization struggles to keep people in leadership positions, consider coaching. With BetterUp, you can invest in the growth and development of your leaders. With a coach as their guide, your managers can be well-equipped to navigate all that future holds — even if we’re uncertain about it. Our science-backed approach to building mental fitness has been proven to lower stress, increase purpose, and increase resilience after just four months of leadership training. The City of Santa Monica looks at leadership through the lens of growth. In fact, Lori Gentiles, chief people officer, City of Santa Monica, talks about investing in people leadership with BetterUp help their employees thrive. Think about all the potential within your organization. What’s stopping you from tapping into it? If it’s an unspoken expectation that leaders come ready-made, know that perspective may be limiting your organization’s — and employee’s — growth. No matter how naturally charismatic, intuitive, or confident a person seems to be, it doesn’t indicate that they’re prepared to lead others. Every person can be a leader with the right coaching and support.
Published August 10, 2022 Madeline MilesMadeline is a writer, communicator, and storyteller who is passionate about using words to help drive positive change. She holds a bachelor's in English Creative Writing and Communication Studies and lives in Denver, Colorado. In her spare time, she's usually somewhere outside (preferably in the mountains) — and enjoys poetry and fiction. Read NextStay connected with BetterUpGet our newsletter, event invites, plus product insights and research.What is a problem with the trait theory of leadership?One major problem with the trait approach to leadership is that no definitive list of leadership traits exists. Due to the large body of research, countless traits are present, making it difficult to determine which traits make the most effective leader.
What is the problem with the trait approach?Some of the most common criticisms of trait theory center on the fact that traits are often poor predictors of behavior. 7 While an individual may score high on assessments of a specific trait, they may not always behave that way in every situation.
What are the 3 major criticisms of the trait approach?1) The approach has not fixed a definitive list of leadership traits and the list that has emerged seems endless. 2) The approach has failed to take situations into account. 3) There has much subjective interpretation of the meaning of the data and data is not always based on reliable research.
What are the limitations of the leadership trait approach?The main limitation of the trait approach was that it ignored the situation in which leadership occurred. Therefore, it is more useful to specify the conditions under which different traits are needed.
|