So sánh inno3d gt 1030 vs gtx 670 pe năm 2024

GTX 1050Ti với hiệu năng vượt trội trở thành người chiến thắng trong phân khúc card đồ họa tầm thấp 3-5 triệu. Dễ dàng vượt mặt đối thủ cạnh tranh RX460 4Gb ở phiên bản được ép xung sẵn. Với khả năng tiết kiệm điện năng vô cùng lợi hại GTX 1050Ti tiêu thụ chưa đến 75W trên khi PCI Express. Còn quá nhiều tiềm năng để đẩy mức xung của GTX 1050Ti lên cao hơn mà chúng tôi còn đang trông chờ ở các OC-er. GTX 1050Ti đang trở thành kẻ thay thế đáng giá cho phân khúc PC tầm thấp, những máy mini PC khi mà các giải pháp tản nhiệt luôn là trở ngại cho những hệ thống như thế này. Tuy nhiên, đối với các bạn thực sự khắt khe trong việc so sanh giữa hiệu năng trên tầm giá thì GTX 1060 mới là cái tên nên được ghi nhớ.

Intel Core i5-3550 3.3GHz Intel Xeon E5-1620 Intel Core i7-4765T 4-Core 2.0GHz Intel Xeon Processor X5680 Intel Xeon E3-1225 v2

Possible GPU Upgrades

-

AMD Radeon R9 290X Sapphire Vapor-X Tri-X OC 4GB Edition AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 Devil 13 AMD Radeon RX 570 Gigabyte Aorus 4GB Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 Asus Strix OC 4GB Edition AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 4GB

The values for the video cards below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

• The first section will show basic information for each Video Card selected.
• The first graph shows the G3D Mark values of each Videocard selected.
• The second graph, if price data is available, will shows the value for money, in terms of the G3DMark per dollar.

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384CUDA cores1344no dataCore clock speed915 MHz1228 MHzBoost clock speed980 MHz1670 MHzNumber of transistors3,540 million1,800 millionManufacturing process technology28 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)170 Watt30 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °Cno dataTexture fill rate102.5 billion/sec35.23Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflops1,127 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4Length9.5" (24.1 cm)145 mmHeight4.376" (11.1 cm)no dataWidth2-slot1-slotSupplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNoneSLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GBMemory bus width256-bit GDDR564 BitMemory clock speed6.0 GB/s6000 MHzMemory bandwidth192.2 GB/s48.06 GB/sShared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMIMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI++HDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataG-SYNC supportno data+Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no dataVR Readyno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)Shader Model5.16.4OpenGL4.24.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 116% in our combined benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 115% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 93% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 60% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 73% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 670 outperforms GT 1030 by 13% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 670 and GeForce GT 1030. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 97 Mh/s no data Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 13 Mh/s no data Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.11 kh/s

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55 25 1440p45−50 21 4K18−20 9

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 13.75 6.38 Recency 10 May 2012 17 May 2017 Cost $399 $79 Memory bus width 256 64 Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB Pipelines / CUDA cores 1344 384 Memory bandwidth 192.2 48.06 Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce GTX 670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 670

GeForce GT 1030

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.