Đánh giá xiaomi mi max 3 64gb năm 2024
|
Với hơn 7 năm kinh nghiệm, HungMobile luôn tự hào là Trùm Xiaomi Số 1 Việt Nam. Đến với HungMobile, khách hàng sẽ có trên tay những chiếc điện thoại mới 100% nguyên Seal, mẫu mã đa dạng, giá rẻ nhất và đặc biệt là chính sách bảo hành lên đến 15 tháng tốt nhất hiện tại. Show Sau sự thành công của Xiaomi với Mi Max và Mi Max 2 thì mới đây thì hãng điện thoại Xiaomi giá rẻ cũng đã cho ra mắt phiên bản nâng cấp mới nhất của thế hệ phablet này đó chính là Mi Max 3. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 được trình làng với 2 phiên bản là Ram 4GB/64GB và 6GB/128GB với nhiều sự thay đổi từ thiết kế, hiệu năng, cho đến các tính năng. Sản phẩm đang được HungMobile nhập về và mức giá bán dự kiến khoảng 7 triệu đồng. _5b5579aae8091_23_07_2018_13_46_02.jpg) Xiaomi Mi Max 3 64GB, bản nâng cấp đáng giá_5b5579930945c_23_07_2018_13_45_39.jpg) Xiaomi Mi Max 3 sở hữu thiết kế được đánh giá cao hơn người tiền nhiệm là Mi Max 2 với phần viền màn hình được làm mỏng hơn nên dù với kích thước 6.9"inch nhưng máy vẫn cầm gọn tay như những máy 6.3"inch. Còn về thiết kế tổng thể thì Mi Max 3 có hình dáng tương tự với Redmi Note 5 Pro với sự kết hợp của kim loại và kính. Máy bán ra với ba màu là màu đen, vàng và xanh. Màn hình lớn, thoải mái sáng tạoMáy được trang bị một màn hình lớn lên đến 6.99"inch, kích thước này gần bằng cả chiếc Mi Pad 4 với màn hình 8"inch mới được hãng cho ra mắt ít lâu trước đó. Mi Max 3 sử dụng công nghệ 18:9, FullHD+(2180xx1080px) và chiếm 85, 19% so với toàn bộ diện tích mặt trước. _5b55798e26ee5_23_07_2018_13_45_34.jpg) Theo hãng công bố thì Mi Max 3 có màn hình sáng hơn 19% và độ tương phản cao hơn 50% so với Mi Max 2. Vì vậy mà trải nghiệm trên màn hình của chiếc máy này cũng sẽ đã hơn rất nhiều. Cấu hình mạnh mẽ, hiệu suất tăng 40%Mi Max 3 ngoài thiết kế mới thì máy cũng được trang bị một con chip SnapDragon 636 với hiệu suất được đánh giá cao hơn SnapDragon 625 lên đến 40% lần. Máy có 2 phiên bản là Ram 4GB và Ram 6GB cùng bộ nhớ trong lần lượt là 64GB và 128GB. Điểm số Antutu được trên Mi Max 3 ở phiên bản Ram 4GB rơi vào khoảng 75000 điểm, với điểm số này thì Mi Max 3 cho trải nghiệm đa nhiệm và hiệu năng cực kì ổn. Máy sẽ được cài sẵn Android 8.1 Oreo với giao diện MIUI tích hợp trợ lý ảo Xiao AI. Camera kép kết hợp công nghệ AIMáy được trang bị cụm camera kép với camera chính là 12.MP và 5.MP (f/1.9), sử dụng công nghệ AI với kích thước điểm ảnh 1.4um. Máy còn hỗ trợ lấy nét theo pha dual-core giúp tính năng tự động lấy nét hoạt động nhanh và chính xác hơn. Nhờ AI, camera sau của Mi Max 3 còn hỗ trợ chụp ảnh thiếu sáng tốt hơn, nhận dạng 206 khung cảnh, nhận dạng vật thể và chụp ảnh chân dung. _5b557a16940b3_23_07_2018_13_47_50.jpg) Camera Sefile của Mi Max 3 là 8.MP với đèn LED, kết hợp với nhiều hiệu ứng chụp ảnh riêng của Xiaomi giúp dễ dàng có bức ảnh Sefile đẹp mắt. Thời lượng pin 5500mAh_5b5579b88b237_23_07_2018_13_46_16.jpg) Mi Max 3 ấn tượng với viên pin 5500mAh cho thời lượng sử dụng vô cùng ấn tượng. Cục pin có thể sử dụng thoải mái trong 2 ngày và có thời gian chờ lên đến 1 tháng. Máy cũng được trang bị công nghệ sạc nhanh QuickCharge 3.0 giúp đầy 71% trong vòng 1 tiếng và khả năng sạc ngược giúp nó có thể sạc cho các thiết bị khác như điện thoại, mi band 3, tai nghe blutooth,.... Các tính năng hiện đạiXiaomi được trang bị cặp loa Stero âm thanh nổi giúp việc trải nghiệm âm thanh dễ dàng hơn khi chơi game hoặc xem phim. Hơn nữa, máy cũng được trang bị cảm biến vân tay, bảo mật khuôn mặt và nhiều tính năng khác. Maximum display diagonal. The 6.9-inch Xiaomi Mi Max 3 offers even more display area to users than its predecessor, and the hardware has also been slightly updated. We clarify in our review what buyers of this Chinese import version can expect for a price of about 250 Euros (~$288; currently $250 to import to the US). Xiaomi has improved the successor of the Mi Max 2 in many places and now offers an even larger mid-range phablet to buyers. There is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC inside, which is supported in its work by an Adreno 509 graphics unit. While our test unit offers 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of eMMC flash storage, supposedly there will also be a model variant with 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of data storage. With its size of 6.9 inches, the Mi Max 3 is a very large Android phablet that can only be compared to smaller devices in our test. Their size is at least 6 inches, and their price and performance are similar. In this test, we include the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, the Honor Play, the JVC J20, and the Asus ZenFone 5 (2018) as smartphones from competitors. Display 6.90 inch 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 350 PPI, capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes Storage 64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB , 50 GB free Connections 1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass Networking 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), 3G WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100), FDD LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS Size height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 176 x 87.4 ( = 0.31 x 6.93 x 3.44 in) Battery 5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer Operating System Android 8.1 Oreo Camera Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.9 Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0 Additional features Speakers: 1 speaker, Keyboard: onscreen, Keyboard Light: yes, USB charger, EU adapter, USB Type-C cable, MIUI 9.6, 24 Months Warranty, SAR value (head): 1.584 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.417 W/kg, fanless Weight 221 g ( = 7.8 oz / 0.49 pounds), Power Supply: 65 g ( = 2.29 oz / 0.14 pounds) Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. The case of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is made of metal and offers a good grip due to its very rounded edges. Since the display sticks out above the body by about 1 mm (~0.04 in), it looks as if it was placed on top of the base, but it still fits well into the overall appearance. The transitions between the materials fit tightly and show very good workmanship. Buyers of the Xiaomi phablet have the choice between black, blue, and gold case colors. On the right side of the case are the power button and volume rocker; they have a slight play in their frames. The nano-SIM/microSD card tray sits tightly in its slot. The dual camera system on the back sticks out slightly from the case, and the fingerprint sensor is located in the center of the upper third of the case. In the size and weight comparisons, the Xiaomi smartphone sticks out significantly in our comparison chart but is also slightly slimmer, and it is not as fat as the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, for example. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Honor Play Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL JVC J20 DIN A6 176 mm / 6.93 inch 87.4 mm / 3.44 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs157 mm / 6.18 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 9.6 mm / 0.378 inch 204 g0.4497 lbs157.9 mm / 6.22 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 176 g0.388 lbs153 mm / 6.02 inch 75.7 mm / 2.98 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 155 g0.3417 lbs149.1 mm / 5.87 inch 72.1 mm / 2.84 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 158 g0.3483 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs Buyers of the Mi Max 3 receive a mid-range phablet that is run by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC with an Adreno 509 graphics unit, 4 GB of RAM, and 64 GB of eMMC flash storage. The internal storage can be expanded via microSD card, but then users will have to make do without the dual-SIM function. There is a 3.5 mm audio port to connect external devices, and you can charge the Android smartphone via a USB Type-C port. While this is only connected via the USB-2.0 standard, it still supports OTG functions such as charging external devices. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 also has an infrared sensor that can be setup to control various multimedia devices via the Mi-Remote app. In this way, the remote control of your TV can be replaced by the Android phablet. The Mi Max 3 has Android Oreo version 8.1 with security updates on the level of July 1, 2018. Xiaomi uses its own in-house MIUI 9.6 user interface, which is mainly characterized by its adjusted sorting of the Settings menu and many apps by the manufacturer. You can easily uninstall apps in the menu that are not relevant for system operation. Since our test unit is an imported device, there are many Chinese apps preinstalled. Furthermore, the Xiaomi phablet is delivered to Europe with an adjusted ROM, requiring users to install the various Google apps from the Play Store themselves, if they want to use them. While this process works without a hitch, it may deter some inexperienced users. In addition, there is the constant "online hunger" that often shows during the operation of the Android phablet. For example, you have to be online if you want to allow the file manager to install programs. Interested buyers should also consider that the menus of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 are in English. In contrast, the version for the local market that is also already available of course supports all the local languages. The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is able to create mobile connections with the GSM, 3G, and LTE networks. The latter is possible with LTE Category 12, which allows download speeds of up to 600 Mb/s and upload speeds of up to 100 Mb/s. The Android phablet can be used globally and also offers the LTE Band 20 that is still important in Germany. For close-up wireless data transfer, Bluetooth version 5.0 and WLAN with the fast ac standard are available to the users of the Xiaomi phablet. In our WLAN test, the Mi Max 3 is able to leave the competitors behind in terms of data reception, achieving a fast 344 Mb/s. However, when sending data it is only sufficient for a place in the middle of our comparison list, reaching 265 Mb/s. Networking iperf3 transmit AX12Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash 347 MBit/s +31% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash 308 MBit/s +16% Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash 265 (253min - 270max) MBit/s JVC J20 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash 226 MBit/s -15% Honor Play Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash 190 MBit/s -28% iperf3 receive AX12Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years) 376 MBit/s +9% Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash 344 (326min - 350max) MBit/s Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash 339 MBit/s -1% Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash 309 MBit/s -10% JVC J20 Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash 221 MBit/s -36% Honor Play Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash 188 MBit/s -45% 020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip We test how accurately the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 can determine our location using the GPS Test app. Outdoors, it can locate us with an accuracy of up to 3 m (~10 ft). Indoors, the Android phablet is also able to create a satellite connection and locates our position with an accuracy of up to 14 m (~46 ft). On our mandatory bike tour, we compare the Mi Max 3 with our Garmin Edge 520 reference device. During long straight runs, the recorded route of the Xiaomi phablet lies only slightly apart from the actual route. In tight turns and longer curves however, the recordings become increasingly inaccurate, some turns are just left out in parts, being replaced merely with straight lines across the surrounding objects. The Mi Max 3 is therefore only suited for simple navigation tasks. There is only a simple app to make phone calls for users of the Mi Max 3. It offers two tabs on the Xiaomi phablet, allowing you to either input numbers directly, or select contacts from the address book. During a phone conversation, the smartphone presents itself as very balanced. The conversation partner is transferred in an easily understandable manner, and background noises are filtered out to some extent. While the volume is okay, it is unable to ensure clear communication on high-traffic roads, for example. The Mi Max 3 supports VoLTE as long as this option is offered by your provider. The Mi Max 3 offers a 12+5 MP dual camera system with an f/1.9 aperture on the back and an 8 MP front camera with an f/2.0 aperture. With the latter, you can take portrait pictures of mediocre quality. While the details are reproduced well in the foreground and background, there is some very coarse graininess even without the zoom. This prevents color transitions from appearing cleanly and blends light and dark areas together, instead of them remaining separated. In Portrait mode, you can influence the image by adjusting the skin tone, eye size, or width of the chin, for example. The main camera of the Mi Max 3 is well-suited for the occasional panorama picture. Large brightness differences only cause limited problems for the Xiaomi phablet. In dark image areas, details remain recognizable and can be distinguished from other objects. The whole image offers many details, although they become slightly blurry when zooming in. In close-ups, this blurriness even occurs with objects that remain outside the focal range. Even though this effect is only slight, it is still noticeable. Colors appear saturated, and light and dark areas are well delineated in the image here as well. Details also remain recognizable. However, at the edges of the images there is some slight graininess that can only be seen when zooming in. Under bad light conditions, objects in the image barely remain recognizable, with large areas of the image becoming black. You can adjust the values for white balance, ISO, shutter speed, and focus via a manual photo mode to influence the image quality. Video-recordings with the Xiaomi smartphone produce a similar result as our example pictures. An image stabilizer compensates for smaller movements. While the camera app of the Mi Max 3 does not offer a professional mode for videos or something similar, there is a Time Shift and a Time Lapse mode. Image Comparison Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device. click to load images Using the ColorChecker passport, we evaluate the color reproduction of the Mi Max 3 camera. It shows here that colors are reproduced too dark through the bank. Gray and black tones are also darker than they should be. Under controlled light conditions, the camera of the Xiaomi smartphone is able to reproduce our test chart well. Fine structures and details remain recognizable. However, even at a low zoom level, they become slightly blurry. Colors appear moderate, and there is a slight paleness at the left edge of the image. The box of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 includes a SIM tool, a USB charger with a US plug and the corresponding USB Type-C cable. Our import version from TradingShenzen also included the corresponding EU adapter. Xiaomi offers a warranty of 24 months to buyers of the Mi Max 3. In the case of the vendor who loaned us the device, this can be handled directly by the vendor. Please see our Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties FAQ for country-specific information. For text input, the Mi Max 3 has the Beidu-IME keyboard, which offers the option to input text in Chinese or English. In browser and messenger input fields, the English version is available most of the time. However, during games it happened occasionally that we were presented with the variant optimized for Chinese characters. The touchscreen offers a smooth surface and responds reliably to touch in any part of the screen. Using the fingerprint sensor on the back, the Xiaomi smartphone can be unlocked quickly. The response time is very brief, and the stored fingerprints are recognized reliably. The screen of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is a 6.9-inch IPS panel that offers a resolution of 2160x1080 pixels. At an average of 505 cd/m², the offered brightness places it in the middle of the field of comparable devices, and the brightness distribution of 91% places it even slightly above. Considering all the characteristics of the panel, the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 offers the best display among the competitors we selected. 522 cd/m²500 cd/m²491 cd/m²512 cd/m²508 cd/m²481 cd/m²530 cd/m²511 cd/m²486 cd/m² Distribution of brightness tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2 Maximum: 530 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 504.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.06 cd/m² Brightness Distribution: 91 % Center on Battery: 508 cd/m² Contrast: 1814:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²) ΔE Color 2.85 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1 ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3 99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D) Gamma: 2.226 Xiaomi Mi Max 3 IPS, 2160x1080, 6.90Sony Xperia XA2 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00Honor Play IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30JVC J20 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL IPS, 2246x1080, 6.20Screen -6% -31% -134% -41% Brightness middle 508 597 18% 435 -14% 411 -19% 595 17% Brightness 505 592 17% 426 -16% 426 -16% 561 11% Brightness Distribution 91 92 1% 89 -2% 82 -10% 87 -4% Black Level * 0.28 0.32 -14% 0.39 -39% 0.53 -89% 0.54 -93% Contrast 1814 1866 3% 1115 -39% 775 -57% 1102 -39% Colorchecker dE 2000 * 2.85 2.4 16% 2.89 -1% 8.84 -210% 4.2 -47% Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * 6.21 5.3 15% 6.03 3% 15.08 -143% 6 3% Greyscale dE 2000 * 1.7 3.4 -100% 4.1 -141% 10.7 -529% 4.7 -176% Gamma 2.226 99% 2.2 100% 2.251 98% 2.433 90% 2.12 104% CCT 6860 95% 7172 91% 7408 88% 10717 61% 7577 86% * ... smaller is better Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹ To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether. Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 10 % brightness setting The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18398 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. Our measurements also attest the display of the Mi Max 3 with a very good contrast ratio of 1814:1 and a good black value of 0.28 cd/m². This causes the colors to appear clearly separated from each other, and black tones are only covered by a very slight gray veil. However, the CalMAN analysis also shows a slightly elevated blue tint. This can be remedied by an adjustment of the color temperature in the Settings menu. To do this, you can either use some preset modes or a color scale for manual adjustments. Display Response Timesℹ Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise ↘ 13 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise ↘ 23 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34.2 ms). The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 can be used easily outdoors. The brightness is sufficient to still recognize the image content in brighter surroundings. There are only moderate reflections of the surrounding objects. However, in direct sunlight it becomes increasingly difficult to read the display content. The viewing angles of the Mi Max 3 IPS panel are very stable, so you can read the content on the screen from almost any direction. As long as there are no reflections hindering the view of the display, the Xiaomi phablet can also be used from unusual positions. In the Mi Max 3, Xiaomi uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC and an integrated Adreno 509 graphics unit. Together with 4 GB of RAM and 64 GB of eMMC flash storage, users receive solid mid-range equipment, allowing them to run many everyday applications. With these hardware components, the Xiaomi phablet places exactly in the middle of the comparison field. The offered performance is at the level of comparable devices with the Snapdragon 636 SoC and is very balanced across all the disciplines of CPU, storage, and graphics. AnTuTu v6 - Total Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 98170 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 70346 Points -28% Honor Play 178745 Points +82% JVC J20 67408 Points -31% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 125213 Points +28% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (92015 - 125213, n=10) 98051 Points 0% AnTuTu v7 - Total Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 118959 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 89006 Points -25% Honor Play 152773 Points +28% JVC J20 89279 Points -25% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 138661 Points +17% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (115565 - 138661, n=11) 118863 Points 0% PCMark for Android - Work performance score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 6040 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 5659 Points -6% Honor Play 9326 Points +54% JVC J20 5762 Points -5% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 6999 Points +16% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6040 - 7618, n=11) 6624 Points +10% Average of class Smartphone (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years) 15091 Points +150% BaseMark OS II Overall Xiaomi Mi Max 3 2058 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1570 Points -24% Honor Play 2174 Points +6% JVC J20 1483 Points -28% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 2156 Points +5% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1734 - 2156, n=10) 1957 Points -5% Average of class Smartphone (411 - 10897, n=151, last 2 years) 5540 Points +169% System Xiaomi Mi Max 3 4320 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3284 Points -24% Honor Play 3795 Points -12% JVC J20 3288 Points -24% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 5348 Points +24% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4320 - 5348, n=10) 4559 Points +6% Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 15935, n=151, last 2 years) 9437 Points +118% Memory Xiaomi Mi Max 3 2492 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1334 Points -46% Honor Play 2417 Points -3% JVC J20 1159 Points -53% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 2314 Points -7% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1236 - 2492, n=10) 1958 Points -21% Average of class Smartphone (670 - 11617, n=151, last 2 years) 6016 Points +141% Graphics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1608 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1480 Points -8% Honor Play 2231 Points +39% JVC J20 1470 Points -9% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 1605 Points 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1590 - 1632, n=10) 1608 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (697 - 36002, n=151, last 2 years) 13088 Points +714% Web Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1037 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 936 Points -10% Honor Play 1091 Points +5% JVC J20 862 Points -17% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 1088 Points +5% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (876 - 1088, n=10) 1037 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years) 1476 Points +42% Geekbench 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1335 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 858 Points -36% Honor Play 1904 Points +43% JVC J20 879 Points -34% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 1506 Points +13% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1323 - 1506, n=11) 1351 Points +1% Average of class Smartphone (800 - 9574, n=87, last 2 years) 4879 Points +265% 64 Bit Multi-Core Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 4939 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 4152 Points -16% Honor Play 6673 Points +35% JVC J20 4220 Points -15% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 5426 Points +10% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4781 - 5426, n=11) 4960 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=87, last 2 years) 12950 Points +162% Compute RenderScript Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 4508 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 3621 Points -20% Honor Play 8454 Points +88% JVC J20 3681 Points -18% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 5041 Points +12% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4278 - 5041, n=11) 4505 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=66, last 2 years) 10144 Points +125% 3DMark1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 19863 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 16972 Points -15% Honor Play 29924 Points +51% JVC J20 16948 Points -15% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 20404 Points +3% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (19525 - 20404, n=11) 19846 Points 0% 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score Xiaomi Mi Max 3 20836 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 18472 Points -11% Honor Play 34836 Points +67% JVC J20 18471 Points -11% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 20722 Points -1% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (20610 - 21067, n=11) 20839 Points 0% 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 17073 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 13217 Points -23% Honor Play 20035 Points +17% JVC J20 13153 Points -23% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 19365 Points +13% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (15766 - 19365, n=11) 17020 Points 0% 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1477 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1334 Points -10% Honor Play 3487 Points +136% JVC J20 1344 Points -9% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 1493 Points +1% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1458 - 1493, n=11) 1475 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=55, last 2 years) 3452 Points +134% 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1335 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1248 Points -7% Honor Play 3734 Points +180% JVC J20 1257 Points -6% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 1329 Points 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1313 - 1353, n=11) 1331 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9025, n=55, last 2 years) 3779 Points +183% 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 1349 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1757 Points +30% Honor Play 2832 Points +110% JVC J20 1770 Points +31% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 2626 Points +95% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (1349 - 2626, n=11) 2280 Points +69% Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=55, last 2 years) 2958 Points +119% 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Xiaomi Mi Max 3 954 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 824 Points -14% Honor Play 2973 Points +212% JVC J20 830 Points -13% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 962 Points +1% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (934 - 962, n=11) 950 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=102, last 2 years) 2685 Points +181% 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 815 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 718 Points -12% Honor Play 3018 Points +270% JVC J20 721 Points -12% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 814 Points 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (797 - 818, n=11) 812 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=102, last 2 years) 2681 Points +229% 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics Xiaomi Mi Max 3 2355 Points Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 1712 Points -27% Honor Play 2827 Points +20% JVC J20 1765 Points -25% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 2634 Points +12% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (2251 - 2634, n=11) 2358 Points 0% Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=102, last 2 years) 3112 Points +32% GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 T-Rex Onscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 34 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 28 fps -18% Honor Play 60 fps +76% JVC J20 28 fps -18% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 34 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (30 - 40, n=12) 34.3 fps +1% Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=177, last 2 years) 82.4 fps +142% 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 36 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 30 fps -17% Honor Play 115 fps +219% JVC J20 29 fps -19% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 36 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (35 - 36, n=12) 35.6 fps -1% Average of class Smartphone (19 - 543, n=177, last 2 years) 236 fps +556% GFXBench 3.0on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL Xiaomi Mi Max 3 15 (16min) fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 13 fps -13% Honor Play 55 fps +267% JVC J20 13 fps -13% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 15 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (13 - 18, n=12) 15 fps 0% Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=178, last 2 years) 70.5 fps +370% 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 16 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 14 fps -12% Honor Play 62 fps +288% JVC J20 14 fps -12% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 16 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (16 - 16, n=12) 16 fps 0% Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 362, n=178, last 2 years) 133.8 fps +736% GFXBench 3.1on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 9.8 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 9.3 fps -5% Honor Play 31 fps +216% JVC J20 9.2 fps -6% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 9.8 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.7 - 12, n=12) 9.47 fps -3% Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=178, last 2 years) 59.1 fps +503% 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 10 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 9.8 fps -2% Honor Play 39 fps +290% JVC J20 9.7 fps -3% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 10 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 10, n=12) 9.68 fps -3% Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 269, n=178, last 2 years) 92.3 fps +823% GFXBenchon screen Car Chase Onscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 6 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 5.3 fps -12% Honor Play 19 fps +217% JVC J20 5.2 fps -13% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 6 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (5.1 - 7.4, n=12) 5.96 fps -1% Average of class Smartphone (5 - 117, n=181, last 2 years) 42.5 fps +608% 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen Xiaomi Mi Max 3 6.3 fps Sony Xperia XA2 Plus 5.6 fps -11% Honor Play 20 fps +217% JVC J20 5.5 fps -13% Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 6.3 fps 0% Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (6.3 - 6.3, n=12) 6.3 fps 0% Average of class Smartphone (2.9 - 166, n=181, last 2 years) 57 fps +805% Legend Xiaomi Mi Max 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 64 GB eMMC Flash Honor Play HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash JVC J20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash In the browser benchmarks, the Mi Max 3 also offers balanced results. While its performance places it in the middle of our comparison field again, it always remains slightly below the performance achieved by other smartphones with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SoC. In everyday life, the Xiaomi phablet ensures fast page loads and also makes media content available quickly. The results of the storage benchmarks also place the Mi Max 3 in the middle of the field of comparison devices. The achieved values attest the Xiaomi smartphone with a good storage performance that has access rates that do not cause any noticeable delays. Of the 64 GB eMMC flash storage, users still have about 50 GB available to store their own applications and data. The storage can be expanded via the internal microSD card reader. However, this can only be used for data. Apps cannot be moved onto the microSD card and it cannot be formatted as internal storage either. Xiaomi Mi Max 3Sony Xperia XA2 PlusHonor PlayJVC J20Asus Zenfone 5 ZE620KLAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5 -15% 70% -17% 3% -17% 309% Sequential Read 256KB 274.6 281.1 2% 895 226% 270.6 -1% 286.6 4% 273 (95.6 - 704, n=200) -1% 1366 (215 - 4512, n=208, last 2 years) 397% Sequential Write 256KB 185.4 146.2 -21% 188.3 2% 199.7 8% 201.8 9% 176.6 (40 - 274, n=200) -5% 981 (57.5 - 3202, n=208, last 2 years) 429% Random Read 4KB 72.9 77.4 6% 142.4 95% 58.3 -20% 71.2 -2% 59.1 (9.58 - 148.5, n=200) -19% 234 (22.2 - 543, n=208, last 2 years) 221% Random Write 4KB 87.1 10.5 -88% 155.5 79% 6.3 -93% 83.5 -4% 31.7 (2.34 - 146.9, n=200) -64% 252 (13 - 691, n=209, last 2 years) 189% Sequential Read 256KB SDCard 83.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3% 82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% 82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% 85.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% 77.4 (21.1 - 107.6, n=144) -8% Sequential Write 256KB SDCard 60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 11% 71.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 19% 63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4% 65.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8% 58.3 (11.2 - 83.3, n=144) -3% The Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is quite suitable for gaming. The internal Adreno 509 graphics unit from Qualcomm is able to display most games smoothly. However, in graphically very-demanding applications, you have to make do with low graphics settings and expect longer load times. The large screen shows games to their best advantage, and the operation does not suffer from the large format. The touchscreen responds to touch directly and offers only slight resistance to the fingertips, so that there are no problems even after longer gaming sessions. The position sensor transmits movements directly to the smartphone, causing them to be translated into the game without any longer delays. In our test, the temperatures on the surface of the Mi Max 3 reach barely above 27 °C (81 °F) during idle and up to 32 °C (90 °F) under load. With this, the Xiaomi smartphone only warms up moderately and can be held comfortably in the hand at all times. The demanding Manhattan 3.1 test of GFXBench also shows that the performance does not drop over longer periods of time. Thus we do not expect any limitations due to high temperatures in the operation of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3. 31.4 °C 89 F28.7 °C 84 F29 °C 84 F 32.3 °C 90 F29 °C 84 F29.1 °C 84 F 31.1 °C 88 F29.2 °C 85 F28.3 °C 83 F Maximum: 32.3 °C = 90 F Average: 29.8 °C = 86 F 29.2 °C 85 F29.8 °C 86 F30.5 °C 87 F28.7 °C 84 F29.8 °C 86 F30.5 °C 87 F29.1 °C 84 F29.4 °C 85 F30.5 °C 87 F Maximum: 30.5 °C = 87 F Average: 29.7 °C = 85 F Power Supply (max.) 35.2 °C = 95 F | Room Temperature 21.9 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260 (+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone. (+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone. (+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F (+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F. The speaker of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is only suitable for the occasional reproduction of media content. With its pronounced mids, the sound is relatively good, but highs and bass are underrepresented. In addition, the volume is only moderate, so that it can only overcome environment noises to a limited extent. You can connect a stereo headset or external speakers to the Android phablet via the 3.5 mm port, which accepts the corresponding plugs tightly and does not influence the reproduction negatively. dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.143.32539.141.63140.333403534.85037.333.96325.221.98024.622.81002524.412520.120.316020.531.120018.243.725018.448.231515.650.240015.757.350015.16163013.265.280014.768.8100013.569.5125014.667.8160012.968.5200011.269.4250010.968.1315010.967.3400010.765.1500010.564.6630010.660.6800010.659.71000010.761.31250010.755.11600010.741.6SPL24.961.878.6N0.614.441.9median 13.2median 61median 60.2Delta3.311.318.4303836.136.83233.529.427.931.536.327.924.722.121.52223.821.224.421.529.720.340.118.446.417.354.316.760.91760.616.162.915.865.615.870.415.372.115.874.514.971.91573.114.775.514.774.91572.515.173.11573.615.473.61567.116.347.727.684.7159.3median 15.8median 67.1212.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Max 3Sony Xperia XA2 Plus Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices) Xiaomi Mi Max 3 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median (+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median (+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median) Compared to same class » 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse » The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134% Compared to all devices tested » 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Sony Xperia XA2 Plus audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB) Bass 100 - 315 Hz (-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median (±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency) Mids 400 - 2000 Hz (+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median (+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency) Highs 2 - 16 kHz (±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median (+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency) Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz (±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median) Compared to same class » 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 41% worse » The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134% Compared to all devices tested » 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse » The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134% Our measurements of the power consumption attest the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 with the second-lowest average consumption during idle as well as under load compared to our competing devices. However, with its maximum power consumption of 6.5 watts under load, the Android smartphone only places in the middle of the field of competitors. In any case, the included 18-watt charger is sized sufficiently to provide enough power to the Xiaomi smartphone. Xiaomi Mi Max 3 5500 mAhSony Xperia XA2 Plus 3580 mAhHonor Play 3750 mAhJVC J20 3400 mAhAsus Zenfone 5 ZE620KL 3300 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption 17% -73% -15% -134% -26% -12% Idle Minimum * 0.7 0.35 50% 1.4 -100% 1 -43% 1.75 -150% 0.944 (0.6 - 1.75, n=12) -35% 0.888 (0.44 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years) -27% Idle Average * 1.5 1.81 -21% 2.6 -73% 1.6 -7% 4.48 -199% 2.22 (1.4 - 4.48, n=12) -48% 1.452 (0.69 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years) 3% Idle Maximum * 2.2 1.83 17% 4.3 -95% 2.8 -27% 4.5 -105% 2.54 (2 - 4.5, n=12) -15% 1.643 (0.79 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years) 25% Load Average * 3.8 3.31 13% 6.5 -71% 4 -5% 7.92 -108% 4.51 (3.65 - 7.92, n=12) -19% 5.26 (2.4 - 15.9, n=157, last 2 years) -38% Load Maximum * 6.5 4.97 24% 8.2 -26% 5.9 9% 13.62 -110% 7.37 (5.1 - 13.6, n=12) -13% 8.02 (4.32 - 20.8, n=157, last 2 years) -23% * ... smaller is better The Mi Max 3 is able to last for almost 22 hours in our realistic WLAN test before it needs to be reconnected to the charger. With this, the Android phablet has a clearly longer battery life than the competitors. However, the good result is also due to the 5500-mAh battery, which is significantly larger than those in comparable devices. Thanks to Quick Charge technology, the battery of the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is completely recharged in slightly more than two hours. Battery Runtime WiFi Websurfing21h 45min Pros
Cons- English menu (not ideal for non English-speaking markets) - some settings can only be modified online - USB 2.0 In our test, the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 shows itself superior to the competition primarily in one aspect: its size. In all the other aspects, the Chinese smartphone is a well-performing mid-range device that places solidly in the middle of the field of comparable smartphones. With its usable cameras, Bluetooth 5.0, and fast ac WLAN, the Android phablet represents a good overall package. With the Xiaomi Mi Max 3, users get a powerful smartphone that mainly convinces with its large display. In terms of usability, interested buyers not only need to deal with the 6.9-inch display, but as an imported device the Xiaomi Mi Max 3 is equipped with an adjusted operating system where users have to manually install the Google Play Store, for example. While this works without a hitch for the most part, the English menus with the occasional adjustments for the Chinese market do not offer the same comfort level that a model for the German language market can bring. Xiaomi Mi Max 3- 10/16/2018 v6(old) Mike Wobker Application Performance 60 / 91 → 66% Smartphone - Weighted Average PricecompareEditor of the original article: Mike Faust - Senior Tech Writer - 424 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017 I carried out my first IT experiments with a 386-based system and a whole 4 MB RAM. This was followed by work on various PCs and laptops that I maintained and repaired for friends and acquaintances. After training to become a Telecommunications Systems Technician and gaining a few years of experience, I graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Currently, I pursue my fascination for IT, technology, and mobile devices by writing reviews and articles for Notebookcheck. I have also worked for Gamestar, Netzwelt, and Golem, among others. |
