So sánh sony a6000 canon eos m3 năm 2024
|
Tham gia: 4/4/08 Được thích: 2,755 Best Answers: 0 Show fRenzy GÀ fRenzy, Vừa rồi mình mới mua A6000 và cho lên đường vào ngày hôm sau. Lý do, body build siêu chán (so với NEX-5). M và M3 là bằng kim loại mát lạnh tuy nhiên hơi nặng hơn. fRenzy, Báo xấu ···
khanhbinh93 Thành viên Tham gia: 1/9/15 Được thích: 7 Best Answers: 0 The Canon EOS M3 and the Sony Alpha A6000 are two digital cameras that were revealed to the public, respectively, in February 2015 and February 2014. Both the M3 and the A6000 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Both cameras offer a resolution of 24 megapixels. Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison. Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS M3 and the Sony Alpha A6000? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.
Body comparisonThe physical size and weight of the Canon M3 and the Sony A6000 are illustrated in the side-by-side display below. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three successive views from the front, the top, and the rear are shown. All width, height and depth measures are rounded to the nearest millimeter. The M3 can be obtained in two different colors (black, white), while the A6000 is available in three color-versions (black, silver, white). If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Sony A6000 is notably larger (7 percent) than the Canon M3. However, the A6000 is markedly lighter (6 percent) than the M3. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the M3 nor the A6000 are weather-sealed. The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems. Concerning battery life, the M3 gets 250 shots out of its LP-E17 battery, while the A6000 can take 360 images on a single charge of its NP-FW50 power pack. The power pack in the A6000 can be charged via the USB port, which can be very convenient when travelling. The table below summarizes the key physical specs of the two cameras alongside a broader set of comparators. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options. Any camera decision will obviously take relative prices into account. The manufacturer’s suggested retail prices give an idea on the placement of the camera in the maker’s lineup and the broader market. The A6000 was launched at a somewhat lower price (by 12 percent) than the M3, which makes it more attractive for photographers on a tight budget. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down.
Sensor comparisonThe imaging sensor is at the core of digital cameras and its size is one of the main determining factors of image quality. A large sensor will tend to have larger individual pixels that provide better low-light sensitivity, wider , and richer than smaller pixel-units in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses. Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor, but their sensors differ slightly in size. The sensor area in the A6000 is 11 percent bigger. As a result of these sensor size differences, the cameras have format factors, respectively, of 1.6 (M3) and 1.5. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2. Even though the A6000 has a larger sensor, both cameras offer the same resolution of 24 megapixels. This implies that the A6000 has a lower pixel density and larger individual pixels (with a of 3.91μm versus 3.72μm for the M3), which gives it a potential advantage in terms of light gathering capacity. It should, however, be noted that the M3 is a somewhat more recent model (by 11 months) than the A6000, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that at least partly compensate for the smaller pixel size. The Canon EOS M3 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 12800, which can be extended to ISO 100-25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Sony Alpha A6000 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200. Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors. Both cameras use a Bayer filter for capturing RGB colors on a square grid of photosensors. This arrangement is found in most digital cameras. Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service assesses and scores the color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors, and also publishes an overall camera score. Of the two cameras under consideration, the A6000 has a markedly higher DXO score than the M3 (overall score 10 points higher), which will translate into better image quality. The advantage is based on 1.3 bits higher color depth, 1.3 EV in additional dynamic range, and 0.2 stops in additional low light sensitivity. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras. Sensor Characteristics # Camera Model Sensor Class Resolution (MP) Horiz. Pixels Vert. Pixels Video Format DXO Portrait DXO Landscape DXO Sports DXO Overall 1. Canon M3 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/30p22.811.81169722. Sony A6000 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/60p24.113.11347823. Canon M6 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/60p23.412.61317784. Canon M100 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/60p23.512.91272785. Canon G7 X Mark II 1-inch 20.0 5472 36481080/60p21.811.9260626. Canon M5 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/60p23.412.41262777. Canon 750D APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/30p22.712.0919718. Canon G5 X 1-inch 20.0 5472 36481080/60p21.412.3471629. Canon M10 APS-C 17.9 5184 34561080/30p22.211.47536510. Canon G7 X 1-inch 20.0 5472 36481080/60p23.012.75567111. Canon M APS-C 17.9 5184 34561080/30p22.111.28276512. Sony A6300 APS-C 24.0 6000 40004K/30p24.413.714378513. Sony RX100 IV 1-inch 20.0 5472 36484K/30p22.812.65917014. Sony A5100 APS-C 24.0 6000 40001080/60p23.812.713478015. Sony A3000 APS-C 19.8 5456 36321080/60i23.712.810687816. Sony NEX-6 APS-C 16.0 4912 32641080/60i23.713.1101878 Note: DXO values in italics represent estimates based on sensor size and age.
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. Both cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a sufficiently high read-out speed for moving images, but the A6000 provides a faster frame rate than the M3. It can shoot movie footage at 1080/60p, while the Canon is limited to 1080/30p.
Feature comparisonApart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the A6000 has an electronic viewfinder (1440k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the M3 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. That said, the M3 can be equipped with an optional viewfinder – the EVF-DC1. The following table reports on some other key feature differences and similarities of the Canon M3, the Sony A6000, and comparable cameras. Core Features # Camera Model Viewfinder (Type or 000 dots) Control Panel (yes/no) LCD Specifications (inch/000 dots) LCD Attach- ment Touch Screen (yes/no) Max Shutter Speed * Max Shutter Flaps * Built-in Flash (yes/no) Built-in Image Stab 1. Canon M3optional n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/4000s 4.2/s Y n 2. Sony A60001440 n3.0 / 922 tilting n 1/4000s 11.0/s Y n 3. Canon M6optional n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/4000s 9.0/s Y n 4. Canon M100none n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/4000s 6.1/s Y n 5. Canon G7 X Mark IInone n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/2000s 8.0/s Y Y 6. Canon M52360 n3.2 / 1620 tilting Y 1/4000s 9.0/s Y n 7. Canon 750Doptical n3.0 / 1040 swivel Y 1/4000s 5.0/s Y n 8. Canon G5 X2360 n3.0 / 1040 swivel Y 1/2000s 5.9/s Y Y 9. Canon M10none n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/4000s 4.6/s Y n 10. Canon G7 Xnone n3.0 / 1040 tilting Y 1/2000s 6.5/s Y Y 11. Canon Mnone n3.0 / 1040 fixed Y 1/4000s 4.3/s n n 12. Sony A63002359 n3.0 / 922 tilting n 1/4000s 11.0/s Y n 13. Sony RX100 IV2359 n3.0 / 1228 tilting n 1/2000s 16.0/s Y Y 14. Sony A5100none n3.0 / 922 tilting Y 1/4000s 6.0/s Y n 15. Sony A3000202 n3.0 / 230 fixed n 1/4000s 2.5/s Y n 16. Sony NEX-62359 n3.0 / 921 tilting n 1/4000s 10.0/s Y n Note: *) Information refers to the mechanical shutter, unless the camera only has an electronic one.
One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen. The M3 has a touchscreen, while the A6000 has a conventional panel. Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point. The M3 has an articulated LCD that can be turned to be front-facing. This characteristic will be appreciated by vloggers and photographers who are interested in snapping selfies. In contrast, the A6000 does not have a selfie-screen. The M3 writes its imaging data to SDXC cards, while the A6000 uses SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.
Connectivity comparisonFor some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS M3 and Sony Alpha A6000 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer. Input-Output Connections # Camera Model Hotshoe Port Internal Mic / Speaker Microphone Port Headphone Port HDMI Port USB Port WiFi Support NFC Support Bluetooth Support 1. Canon M3Ystereo / monoY-mini2.0YY- 2. Sony A6000Ystereo / mono--micro2.0YY- 3. Canon M6Ystereo / monoY-mini2.0YYY 4. Canon M100-stereo / mono--micro2.0YYY 5. Canon G7 X Mark II-stereo / mono--micro2.0YY- 6. Canon M5Ystereo / monoY-mini2.0YYY 7. Canon 750DYstereo / monoY-mini2.0YY- 8. Canon G5 XYstereo / mono--mini2.0YY- 9. Canon M10-stereo / mono--mini2.0YY- 10. Canon G7 X-stereo / mono--micro2.0YY- 11. Canon MYstereo / monoY-mini2.0- 12. Sony A6300Ystereo / monoY-micro2.0YY- 13. Sony RX100 IV-stereo / mono--micro2.0YY- 14. Sony A5100-stereo / mono--micro2.0YY- 15. Sony A3000Ystereo / mono--mini2.0- 16. Sony NEX-6Ystereo / mono--mini2.0Y--
It is notable that the M3 has a microphone port, which is missing on the A6000. Such an external microphone input can help to substantially improve the quality of audio recordings when a good external microphone is used. Both the M3 and the A6000 have been discontinued, but can regularly be found used on ebay. The A6000 was replaced by the Sony A6300, while the M3 was followed by the Canon M6. Further information on the features and operation of the M3 and A6000 can be found, respectively, in the Canon M3 Manual (free pdf) or the online Sony A6000 Manual.
Review summarySo how do things add up? Is the Canon M3 better than the Sony A6000 or vice versa? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants. Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS M3:
Reasons to prefer the Sony Alpha A6000:
If the count of relative strengths (bullet points above) is taken as a measure, the A6000 is the clear winner of the contest (10 : 5 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one. M3 05:10 A6000 How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon M3 and the Sony A6000 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop. In any case, while the comparison of technical specifications can provide a useful overview of the capabilities of different cameras, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the M3 and the A6000 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable. Expert reviewsThis is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The table below provides a synthesis of the camera assessments of some of the best known photo-gear review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], digitalcameraworld [DCW], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice. The review scores listed above should be treated with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. A score, therefore, has to be seen in close connection to the price and market introduction time of the camera, and rating-comparisons among cameras that span long time periods or concern very differently equipped models make little sense. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts. Other camera comparisonsDid this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you would like to check on the differences and similarities of other camera models, just make your choice using the following search menu. There is also a set of direct links to comparison reviews that other users of the CAM-parator app explored.
Specifications: Canon M3 vs Sony A6000Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features. |
